Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26975901›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2016

The influence of clinical and genetic factors on patient outcome in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type.

Leora Witkowski, Catherine Goudie, Pilar Ramos, Talia Boshari, Jean-Sebastien Brunet, Anthony N Karnezis, Michel Longy, James A Knost, Emmanouil Saloustros, W Glenn McCluggage and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Rare solid tumours as indicators of hereditary cancer syndromes.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated gastric carcinoma: a case series and literature review.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.

Leora WitkowskiDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Catherine GoudieDepartment of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Pilar RamosIntegrated Cancer Genomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Talia BoshariLady Davis Institute and Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jean-Sebastien BrunetSSENSE, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Anthony N KarnezisBC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Michel LongyCancer Genetics Unit & INSERM U916, Institut Bergonié, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
James A KnostIllinois Cancer Care, Peoria, IL, USA.
Emmanouil SaloustrosHereditary Cancer Clinic, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.
W Glenn McCluggageDepartment of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Colin J R StewartDepartment of Histopathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Australia.
William P D HendricksIntegrated Cancer Genomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Heather CunliffeDepartment of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
David G HuntsmanBC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Patricia PautierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Douglas A LevineDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, New York, USA.
Jeffrey M TrentIntegrated Cancer Genomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Andrew BerchuckDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Martin HasselblattInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
William D FoulkesDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Lady Davis Institute and Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medical Genetics and Cancer Research Program, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: William.foulkes@mcgill.ca.
Translational Genomics Research Institute · USBC Cancer Agency · CAMcGill University · CABelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBDuke Medical Center · USIllinois CancerCare · USInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRJewish General Hospital · CAKing Edward Memorial Hospital · AUMcGill University Health Centre · CAMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity Hospital of Heraklion · GRUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

The Tumor Suppressor Role of SMARCA4 in SCCOHTR01CA195670 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HUNTSMAN, DAVID, TRENT, JEFFREY M. · 2015 to 2019
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSmall cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) is an aggressive tumor, with long term survival at ~30% in early stage disease. SCCOHT is caused by germline and somatic SMARCA4 mutations, but the effect of the mutation type on patients remains unknown. Furthermore, the rarity of SCCOHT has resulted in varied treatment, with no standardized protocols. We analyzed 293 cases to determine the effect of treatment modalities and SMARCA4 mutations on patient diagnosis and outcome.

methodsIn 293 SCCOHT patients we collected information on age and stage at diagnosis, treatment modality (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue (HDC-aSCR)), SMARCA4 mutation origin (germline/somatic), and overall survival. Cox analysis and log-rank tests were performed on 257 cases with available survival data.

resultsThe strongest prognostic factors were stage at diagnosis (p=2.72e-15) and treatment modality (p=3.87e-13). For FIGO stages II-IV, 5-year survival was 71% for patients who received HDC-aSCR, compared to 25% in patients who received conventional chemotherapy alone following surgery (p=0.002). Patients aged ≥40 had a worse outcome than younger patients (p=0.04). Twenty-six of 60 tested patients carried a germline SMARCA4 mutation, including all patients diagnosed <15years; carriers presented at a younger age than non-carriers (p=0.02).

conclusionsStage at diagnosis is the most significant prognostic factor in SCCOHT and consolidation with HDC-aSCR may provide the best opportunity for long-term survival. The large fraction of SMARCA4 germline mutations carriers warrants genetic counseling for all patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsCarcinoma, Small CellChildCohort StudiesDNA HelicasesFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansHypercalcemiaKaplan-Meier EstimateNeoplasm StagingNuclear ProteinsOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisDNA HelicasesNuclear ProteinsSMARCA4 protein, humanTranscription FactorsChemotherapyMutationOvarian cancerSCCOHTSMARCA4Stem cell rescue

Identifiers

PMID26975901
PMCPMC6876126
OpenAlexW2300491315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.