Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26975865›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2016

The Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Stratifies and Predicts Survival of High-Risk Individuals Among Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients.

Christina W Lee, Katheryn H Wilkinson, Adam C Sheka, Glen E Leverson, Gregory D Kennedy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina W LeeDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Katheryn H WilkinsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Adam C ShekaDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Glen E LeversonDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Gregory D KennedyDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA kennedyg@surgery.wisc.edu.
Wisconsin Division of Public Health · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) is an empiric transform formula that incorporates positive and negative lymph node data into a single ratio for prognostic utility. We sought to determine the value of the log odds ratio as a prognostic indicator compared with established lymph node indices in advanced-stage rectal cancer patients who have undergone curative resection.

methodsRetrospective analysis of rectal cancer operations from 1995 to 2013 identified all stage III cancer patients who underwent curative resection. Patients were stratified into three groups according to calculated lymph node ratios (LNRs) and log odds ratios (LODDS). The relationship between LNR, LODDS, and 5-year overall survival (OS) were assessed.

resultsOS for all patients was 81.4%. Both LNR and LODDS stratifications identified differences in 5-year OS. LODDS stratification was significantly associated with OS (p = .04). Additional significant clinicopathologic demographic variables included sex (p = .02), venous invasion (p = .02), tumor location (p < .001), and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (p = .047). LODDS separated survival among patients in the low LNR group (LNR1).

conclusionThis study confirms that the measure of lymph node involvement transformed by the log odds ratio is a suitable predictor of 5-year overall survival in stage III rectal cancer. LODDS may be applied to stratify high-risk patients in the management of adjuvant therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Traditionally, clinicians have relied solely on the total number of positive lymph nodes affected when determining patient prognosis in rectal cancer. However, the current staging strategy does not account for "high-risk," biologically aggressive tumors that fall into the same risk categories as less clinically aggressive tumors. The log odds of positive lymph nodes is a logistic transform formula that uses pathologic lymph node data to stratify survival differences among patients within a single stage of disease. This formula allows clinicians to identify whether patients with clinically aggressive tumors fall into higher-risk groups, providing additional insight into how to better counsel patients and manage postoperative therapies.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisPrognosisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRectal NeoplasmsLog oddsLymph nodePrognosisStage III rectal cancerSurvival stratification

Identifiers

PMID26975865
PMCPMC4828122
OpenAlexW2297361122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.