Neglected tropical diseases in the genomics era: re-evaluating the impact of new drugs and mass drug administration.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Of Drugs and Trypanosomatids: New Tools and Knowledge to Reduce Bottlenecks in Drug Discovery.Genes · 2020
   Review
2. Assembling Pharma Resources to Tackle Diseases of Underserved Populations.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2020
   Article
3. Identification of a novel fused gene family implicates convergent evolution in eukaryotic calcium signaling.BMC genomics · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as