Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26975402›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

Mechanistic interrogation of combination bevacizumab/dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor response in glioblastoma implementing novel MR and PET imaging biomarkers.

Philip J O'Halloran, Thomas Viel, David W Murray, Lydia Wachsmuth, Katrin Schwegmann, Stefan Wagner, Klaus Kopka, Monika A Jarzabek, Patrick Dicker, Sven Hermann and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pre-operative dual-time-point [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Emerging Role of Amino Acid PET in Neuro-Oncology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Philip J O'HalloranDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Thomas VielEuropean Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität (WWU) Münster, Münster, Germany.
David W MurrayDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Lydia WachsmuthDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Katrin SchwegmannEuropean Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität (WWU) Münster, Münster, Germany.
Stefan WagnerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Klaus KopkaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Monika A JarzabekDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Patrick DickerDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Sven HermannEuropean Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität (WWU) Münster, Münster, Germany.
Cornelius FaberDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Tim KlasenDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Michael SchäfersEuropean Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität (WWU) Münster, Münster, Germany.
David O'BrienNational Neurosurgical Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Jochen H M PrehnDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Andreas H JacobsEuropean Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität (WWU) Münster, Münster, Germany.
Annette T ByrneDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland. annettebyrne@rcsi.ie.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Münster · DEBeaumont Hospital · IEJohanniter-Krankenhaus Bonn · DEParis Cardiovascular Research Center · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResistance to bevacizumab (BEV) in glioblastoma is believed to occur via activation of molecular networks including the mTOR/PI3K pathway. Using an MR/PET molecular imaging biomarker approach, we investigated the response to combining BEV with the mTOR/PI3K inhibitor BEZ235.

methodsTumours were established by orthotopically implanting U87MG-luc2 cells in mice. Animals were treated with BEZ235 and/or BEV, and imaged using diffusion-weighted-MRI, T2-weighted and T2*-weighted before and after administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agent. Maps for changes in relaxation rates (ΔR2, ΔR2* and apparent diffusion coefficient) were calculated. Vessel size index and microvessel density index were derived. 3'-Deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) PET and O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([(18)F]FET) PET were further performed and tumour endothelium/proliferation markers assessed by immunohistochemistry.

resultsTreatment with BEV resulted in a pronounced decrease in tumour volume (T2-weighted MRI). No additive effect on tumour volume was observed with the BEV/BEZ235 combination compared with BEV monotherapy. The Ki67 proliferation index and [(18)F]FLT uptake studies were used to support the observations. Using ΔR2* and ΔR2 values, respectively, the BEV/BEZ235 combination significantly reduced tumour microvessel volume in comparison to BEV alone. Decreased microvessel density index was further observed in animals treated with the combination, supported by von Willebrand factor (vWF) immunohistochemistry. [(18)F]FET uptake was decreased following treatment with BEV alone, but was not further reduced following treatment with the combination. vWF immunohistochemistry analysis showed that the mean tumour vessel size was increased in all cohorts.

conclusionAssessing MR imaging biomarker parameters together with [(18)F]FET and [(18)F]FLT PET provided information on mechanism of action of the drug combination and clues as to potential clinical responses. Following translation to clinical use, treatment with a BEV/BEZ235 combination could reduce peritumoral oedema obviating the requirement for steroids. The use of hypothesis-driven molecular imaging studies facilitates the preclinical evaluation of drug response. Studies of this kind may more accurately predict the clinical potential of the BEV/BEZ235 combination regimen as a novel therapeutic approach in oncology.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsPositron-Emission TomographyAnimalsBevacizumabBiological TransportBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorDrug InteractionsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansImidazolesMiceMicrovesselsMultimodal Imaging(18F)fluoroethyltyrosineBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumordactolisibImidazolesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinolinesTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesTyrosineBevacizumabBEZ235GlioblastomaPETT2-weighted MRI

Identifiers

PMID26975402
OpenAlexW2300124556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.