ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2017
What Are the Conditional Survival and Functional Outcomes After Surgical Treatment of 115 Patients With Sacral Chordoma?
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcomes of sacral and sacrococcygeal chordomas: a 30-year single-center experience comparing 3 treatment modalities.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2026Article
- Impact of Surgical Margins and Adjuvant Radiotherapy on Local Recurrence and Survival in Sacral Chordoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary En-Bloc Resection of Sacral Chordoma: A Narrative Review and Illustrative Case.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Synthetic Mesh Reconstruction Improves Pelvic Floor Function and Quality of Life After Sacrectomy: A Preliminary Clinical Assessment.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcome after Surgical Treatment of Sacral Chordomas: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort of 27 Patients.Cancers · 2024Article
- Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in sacral tumour surgery and comprehensive description of a multidisciplinary program: a prospective study in a specialized hospital in China.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Clinical characteristics and predisposing factors of lung metastasis in sacral chordoma: a cross-sectional cohort study of 221 cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Surgical and Functional Outcomes of En Bloc Resection of Sacral Chordoma: a Retrospective Analysis.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Outcomes of Surgery for Sacral Chordoma and Impact of Complications: A Report of 50 Consecutive Patients With Long-Term Follow-Up.Global spine journal · 2021Article
- Sacral and thoracic chordoma with pulmonary metastases: A case report and review of the literature.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- A case-control study of computer navigation assisted resection of primary sacral chordoma above sacrum 3 level.Journal of bone oncology · 2020Article
- Prognostic Significance of Cyclin E1 Expression in Patients With Chordoma: A Clinicopathological and Immunohistochemical Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Clinical-radiomics nomograms for pre-operative differentiation of sacral chordoma and sacral giant cell tumor based on 3D computed tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2019Article
- Local and Distant Recurrence in Resected Sacral Chordomas: A Systematic Review and Pooled Cohort Analysis.Global spine journal · 2019Review
- Comparison of radiomics machine-learning classifiers and feature selection for differentiation of sacral chordoma and sacral giant cell tumour based on 3D computed tomography features.European radiology · 2019Article
- Defining preoperative imaging findings of sacral chordomas associated with decreased overall survival and local recurrence.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2019Article
- Expert's Comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Cryosurgery in the excision of a giant local recurrent sacral chordoma: a case report and literature review" by V. Pipola et al. (Eur Spine J; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5438-3).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018Article
- Variables affecting functional improvement in chordoma patients admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility: A retrospective review.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2018Review
- Managing bowel and bladder impairments in sacral chordoma patients: a case-based approach.Spinal cord series and cases · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byCORR Insights2017
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConditional survival is a measure of prognosis for patients who have already survived for a specific period of time; however, data on conditional survival after sacrectomy in patients with sacral chordoma are lacking. In addition, because sacral tumors are rare and heterogeneous, classifying them in a way that allows physicians to predict functional outcomes after sacrectomy remains a challenge. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the overall survival and disease-free survival in patients treated by sacrectomy for chordoma? (2) What is the conditional survival probability and how do prognostic factors change over time in patients undergoing surgical resection for sacral chordoma? (3) What is the local recurrence rate after surgery, how was it treated, and what factors impact on local recurrence? (4) What is the postoperative motor, sensory, bowel, and bladder function by level of resection as determined by using a newly designed scoring method?
methodsBetween 2003 and 2012, our center treated 122 patients surgically for sacral chordoma. Of those, two died and five were lost before a minimum followup of 1 year was achieved, leaving 115 patients available for analysis in this retrospective study at a mean of 4.9 years (range, 1.3-10.8 years). Basically, single posterior or combined approaches were chosen based on the most cephalad extent of the tumor and resection level was normally at half or one sacral vertebrae above the tumor. The 5-year conditional survival rate was calculated based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The effect of prognostic factors on conditional survival was also explored. A newly designed score method was proposed and adopted in the current study to critically evaluate the functional outcome after resection of the sacrum. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was tested by a preliminary study using kappa statistics and Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Significant interobserver (p < 0.01) and intraobserver agreement (κ > 0.75) were found in nine items between each observer.
resultsThe estimated 5-year overall survival rate was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72%-90%) at diagnosis. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 52% (95% CI, 43%-63%). The 5-year conditional overall survival decreased with each additional year in the first 4 years (81% at diagnosis versus 60% at the fourth year, p < 0.0001) and increased slightly in the fifth year. Patients with adequate surgical margins displayed a higher 5-year survival than those with an inadequate margin (86% [95% CI, 76%-95%] versus 67% [95% CI, 48%-85%], p = 0.01) at diagnosis. Conditional survival estimates for patients who received operations elsewhere were lower than that of newly diagnosed patients treated by us at diagnosis (64% [95% CI, 46%-83%] versus 90% [95% CI, 82%-99%], p = 0.012), but with the numbers we had, we could not detect a difference in conditional survival between those treated elsewhere first compared with those initially treated by us at 5 years. The proposed score system for function evaluation was able to distinguish different levels of resection. The overall functional results for the preservation of bilateral S1, S2, and S3 were 40 ± 8%, 60 ± 12%, and 82 ± 11%, respectively. Patients who had preservation of only one S3 nerve root had more severe incontinence (1.99 ± 0.79 versus 2.60 ± 0.63, p = 0.01) and more sensory loss (1.88 ± 0.82 versus 2.31 ± 0.59, p = 0.02) than those patients with preservation of bilateral S3 nerve roots.
conclusionsThe 5-year conditional survival for sacral chordoma decreased with each additional year and began to improve after the fourth year. In addition, the effect of the surgical margin and influence of previous surgery on conditional survival were not linear over time. The level of nerve root resections corresponded with the overall function scores according to the proposed scoring method. This information and scoring system should be valuable in discussing outcomes of sacrectomy in patients with chordoma who are considering this operation and serve as the basis for further study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.