ReviewHealth research policy and systems2016
Evidence for Health I: Producing evidence for improving health and reducing inequities.
Review in Health research policy and systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Individual and institutional capacity-building for evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran: a mix of local and global evidence.Health research policy and systems · 2022Pooled it
- From knowledge accumulation to transformative action: research to catalyze progress on social determinants of health equity.International journal for equity in health · 2026Review
- A maturity model framework for federated networks of trusted research environments.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- International Consensus on Evidence Gaps and Research Opportunities in Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Research gaps identified in Iran's health technology assessment reports.Health research policy and systems · 2023Review
- Evaluating local primary health care actions to address health inequities: analysis of Australia's Primary Health Networks.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of Health Promotion Interventions in Primary Schools-A Mixed Methods Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Scaling-up integrated type-2 diabetes and hypertension care in Cambodia: what are the barriers to health system performance?Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Policy options to increase motivation for improving evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran.Health research policy and systems · 2021Article
- Health system decision-makers at the helm of implementation research: development of a framework to evaluate the processes and effectiveness of embedded approaches.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- Advancing health equity through the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2018Article
- Understanding the concept and importance of the health research system in Palestine: a qualitative study.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- 'Knowledge for better health' revisited - the increasing significance of health research systems: a review by departing Editors-in-Chief.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
- Development of evidence-based practice in occupational health services in Sweden: a 3-year follow-up of attitudes, barriers and facilitators.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2017Article
- Taking action on the social determinants of health in clinical practice: a framework for health professionals.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In an ideal world, researchers and decision-makers would be involved from the outset in co-producing evidence, with local health needs assessments informing the research agenda and research evidence informing the actions taken to improve health. The first step in improving the health of individuals and populations is therefore gaining a better understanding of what the main health problems are, and of these, which are the most urgent priorities by using both quantitative data to develop a health portrait and qualitative data to better understand why the local population thinks that addressing certain health challenges should be prioritized in their context. Understanding the causes of these health problems often involves analytical research, such as case-control and cohort studies, or qualitative studies to better understand how more complex exposures lead to specific health problems (e.g. by interviewing local teenagers discovering that watching teachers smoke in the school yard, peer pressure, and media influence smoking initiation among youth). Such research helps to develop a logic model to better map out the proximal and distal causes of poor health and to determine potential pathways for intervening and impacting health outcomes. Rarely is there a single 'cure' or stand-alone intervention, but rather, a continuum of strategies are needed from diagnosis and treatment of patients already affected, to disease prevention, health promotion and addressing the upstream social determinants of health. Research for developing and testing more upstream interventions must often go beyond randomized controlled trials, which are expensive, less amenable to more complex interventions, and can be associated with certain ethical challenges. Indeed, a much neglected area of the research cycle is implementation and evaluation research, which often involves quasi-experimental research study designs as well as qualitative research, to better understand how to derive the greatest benefit from existing interventions and ways of maximizing health improvements in specific local contexts. There is therefore a need to alter current incentive structures within the research enterprise to place greater emphasis on implementation and evaluation research conducted in collaboration with knowledge users who are in a position to use the findings in practice to improve health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.