Trial reportPloS one2016
Highest Vaccine Uptake after School-Based Delivery - A County-Level Evaluation of the Implementation Strategies for HPV Catch-Up Vaccination in Sweden.
Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The structural and organizational aspects of human papillomavirus vaccine affecting immunization coverage in Europe: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic literature review of human papillomavirus vaccination strategies in delivery systems within national and regional immunization programs.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Pooled it
- Increasing HPV Vaccination Uptake among Adolescents: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Coverage Estimates Among the Primary Target Cohort (9-14-Year-Old Girls) in the World (2010-2024).Vaccines · 2025Article
- Review
- Immunization status of children at kindergarten entry in Alberta, Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2023Article
- The impact of publicly funded immunization programs on human papillomavirus vaccination in boys and girls: An observational study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2022Article
- Coincidence analysis: a new method for causal inference in implementation science.Implementation science : IS · 2020Article
- What school-level and area-level factors influenced HPV and MenACWY vaccine coverage in England in 2016/2017? An ecological study.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Countering vaccine hesitancy through immunization information systems, a narrative review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2019Review
- Cost-effectiveness of two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination in Singapore.Singapore medical journal · 2018Article
- Article
- Human papillomavirus vaccine use in clinical practice - What dermatologists should know as health care providers.Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDSReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Swedish school-based vaccination programme offers HPV vaccine to girls born ≥1999 in 5-6th grade. In 2012, all counties introduced free-of-charge catch-up vaccination campaigns targeting girls born 1993-1998. Varying vaccine uptake in the catch-up group by December 2012 suggested that some implementation strategies were more successful than others. In order to inform future vaccination campaigns, we assessed the impact of different implementation strategies on the county-level catch-up vaccine uptake.
methodsWe conducted an ecological study including all Swedish counties (n = 21), asking regional health offices about the information channels they used and where vaccination of the catch-up target group took place in their counties. The uptake of ≥1 dose by 30 September 2014 was estimated using data from the voluntary national vaccination register. We investigated associations between counties' catch-up vaccine uptake, information channels and vaccination settings by calculating incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), using negative binomial regression models.
resultsCounty level catch-up vaccine uptake varied between 49-84%. All counties offered vaccination through primary health care settings. Apart from this eight (34%) also offered the vaccine in some of their schools, four (19%) in all their schools, and two (10%) in other health care centres. The information channels most frequently used were: information at the national on-line health care consulting web-page (100%), letter/invitations (90%), and advertisement (81%). Counties offering vaccination to girls in all schools and counties offering vaccination in some of their schools, reached higher vaccine uptake compared to counties not offering vaccination in any of their schools (all schools adjusted IRR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.5, some schools adjusted IRR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3).
conclusionCounties offering HPV vaccination to catch-up groups in schools reached the highest vaccine uptake. No information channel explained differences in county-level vaccine uptake. Our findings suggest that catch-up vaccination outside the national vaccination program can reach a high uptake at the population level if it is implemented primarily with an organized delivery (e.g. in schools).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.