Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26974655›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Iminosugars Inhibit Dengue Virus Production via Inhibition of ER Alpha-Glucosidases--Not Glycolipid Processing Enzymes.

Andrew C Sayce, Dominic S Alonzi, Sarah S Killingbeck, Beatrice E Tyrrell, Michelle L Hill, Alessandro T Caputo, Ren Iwaki, Kyoko Kinami, Daisuke Ide, J L Kiappes and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Off-Target Binding of Miglustat to Glycogen Debranching Enzyme.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew C SayceOxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dominic S AlonziOxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sarah S KillingbeckDivision of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, School of Public Health, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Beatrice E TyrrellOxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Michelle L HillOxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alessandro T CaputoOxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ren IwakiDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Kyoko KinamiDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Daisuke IdeDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
J L KiappesOxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
P Robert BeattyDivision of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, School of Public Health, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Atsushi KatoDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Eva HarrisDivision of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, School of Public Health, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Raymond A DwekOxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Joanna L MillerOxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nicole ZitzmannOxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of California, Berkeley · USToyama University Hospital · JPUniversity of Toyama · JP

Funding

Determinants of protection and enhancement of dengue infection/disease in vivoR01AI085607 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HARRIS, EVA · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI085607Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been thought that iminosugar antiviral activity is a function of inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum-resident α-glucosidases, and on this basis, many iminosugars have been investigated as therapeutic agents for treatment of infection by a diverse spectrum of viruses, including dengue virus (DENV). However, iminosugars are glycomimetics possessing a nitrogen atom in place of the endocyclic oxygen atom, and the ubiquity of glycans in host metabolism suggests that multiple pathways can be targeted via iminosugar treatment. Successful treatment of patients with glycolipid processing defects using iminosugars highlights the clinical exploitation of iminosugar inhibition of enzymes other than ER α-glucosidases. Evidence correlating antiviral activity with successful inhibition of ER glucosidases together with the exclusion of alternative mechanisms of action of iminosugars in the context of DENV infection is limited. Celgosivir, a bicyclic iminosugar evaluated in phase Ib clinical trials as a therapeutic for the treatment of DENV infection, was confirmed to be antiviral in a lethal mouse model of antibody-enhanced DENV infection. In this study we provide the first evidence of the antiviral activity of celgosivir in primary human macrophages in vitro, in which it inhibits DENV secretion with an EC50 of 5 μM. We further demonstrate that monocyclic glucose-mimicking iminosugars inhibit isolated glycoprotein and glycolipid processing enzymes and that this inhibition also occurs in primary cells treated with these drugs. By comparison to bicyclic glucose-mimicking iminosugars which inhibit glycoprotein processing but do not inhibit glycolipid processing and galactose-mimicking iminosugars which do not inhibit glycoprotein processing but do inhibit glycolipid processing, we demonstrate that inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum-resident α-glucosidases, not glycolipid processing, is responsible for iminosugar antiviral activity against DENV. Our data suggest that inhibition of ER α-glucosidases prevents release of virus and is the primary antiviral mechanism of action of iminosugars against DENV.

Indexed as

alpha-GlucosidasesAnimalsAntiviral AgentsCells, CulturedDengue VirusEndoplasmic ReticulumEnzyme InhibitorsHumansImino SugarsIndolizidinesIndolizinesMacrophagesModels, MolecularMolecular StructureVirus Releasealpha-GlucosidasesAntiviral AgentscelgosivirEnzyme InhibitorsImino SugarsIndolizidinesIndolizines

Identifiers

PMID26974655
PMCPMC4790851
OpenAlexW2297939881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.