Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26974546›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2016

Potential Influence of Advance Care Planning and Palliative Care Consultation on ICU Costs for Patients With Chronic and Serious Illness.

Nita Khandelwal, David C Benkeser, Norma B Coe, J Randall Curtis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Advance Care Planning Engagement of Older Adults in the Emergency Department.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The differences in code status conversation approaches reported by emergency medicine and palliative care clinicians: A mixed-method study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nita Khandelwal1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA. 2Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 3Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 4Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
David C Benkeser
Norma B Coe
J Randall Curtis

Funding

Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine Training GrantT32GM086270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Tonya M Palermo · 2009 to 2026
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the potential ICU-related cost savings if in-hospital advance care planning and ICU-based palliative care consultation became standard of care for patients with chronic and serious illness. DESIGN AND

settingDecision analysis using literature estimates and inpatient administrative data from Premier. PATIENTS: Patients with chronic, life-limiting illness admitted to a hospital within the Premier network.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsUsing Premier data (2008-2012), ICU resource utilization and costs were tracked over a 1-year time horizon for 2,097,563 patients with chronic life-limiting illness. Using a Markov microsimulation model, we explored the potential cost savings from the hospital system perspective under a variety of scenarios by varying the interventions' efficacies and availabilities. Of 2,097,563 patients, 657,825 (31%) used the ICU during the 1-year time horizon; mean ICU spending per patient was 11.3k (SD, 17.6k). In the base-case analysis, if in-hospital advance care planning and ICU-based palliative care consultation were systematically provided, we estimated a mean reduction in ICU costs of 2.8k (SD, 14.5k) per patient and an ICU cost saving of 25%. Among the simulated patients who used the ICU, the receipt of both interventions could have resulted in ICU cost savings of 1.9 billion, representing a 6% reduction in total hospital costs for these patients.

conclusionsIn-hospital advance care planning and palliative care consultation have the potential to result in significant cost savings. Studies are needed to confirm these findings, but our results provide guidance for hospitals and policymakers.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChronic DiseaseCritical IllnessDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHospital CostsHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedPalliative Care

Identifiers

PMID26974546
PMCPMC4949109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.