ArticleCritical care medicine2016
Systematic Bias in Meta-Analyses of Time to Antimicrobial in Sepsis Studies.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- [S3 Guideline Sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and aftercare : Long version].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020Guideline
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.Intensive care medicine · 2017Guideline
- Duration of antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial of a clinical and C-reactive protein-based protocol versus an evidence-based best practice strategy without biomarkers.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Trial
- A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Article
- Compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline 1-hour bundle for septic shock in China in 2018.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Sepsis-Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Concepts.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Epidemiology and risk factors of candidemia due to Candida parapsilosis in an intensive care unit.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2021Article
- Prevalence and Prognostic Impact of Hypernatremia in Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A Single Centre Experience.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2020Article
- Rules of anti-infection therapy for sepsis and septic shock.Chinese medical journal · 2019Review
- The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 update.Intensive care medicine · 2018Article
- The authors reply.Critical care medicine · 2016Article
- Imipenem-induced paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in a sepsis patient.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26974458What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.