Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Condom Use: We Need a Better Message.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Users' Knowledge, Conversations with Healthcare Providers, and Condom Use: Findings from a U.S. Nationally Representative Probability Survey.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2021
   Article
2. Contraceptive Initiation Among Women in the United States: Timing, Methods Used, and Pregnancy Outcomes.Pediatrics · 2019
   Article
3. Do health promotion messages integrate unintended pregnancy and STI prevention? A content analysis of online information for adolescents and young adults.Contraception · 2018
   Article
4. Moving the Message Beyond the Methods: Toward Integration of Unintended Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Infection/HIV Prevention.American journal of preventive medicine · 2018
   Article
5. Are LARC Users Less Likely to Use Condoms? An Analysis of U.S. Women Initiating LARC in 2008-2018.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Condom Use Among Female US High School Students: Implications for Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention.2016

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as