Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26973859›Full record

ArticleOncoscience2016

Early onset esophageal adenocarcinoma: a distinct molecular entity?

Anna M J van Nistelrooij, Ronald van Marion, PALGA-group, Katharina Biermann, Manon C W Spaander, J Jan B van Lanschot, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Winand N M Dinjens

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Epidemiology and Outcomes of Young-Onset Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: An Analysis from a Population-Based Database.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna M J van NistelrooijDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald van MarionDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
PALGA-group
Katharina BiermannDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Manon C W SpaanderDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Jan B van LanschotDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas P L WijnhovenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Winand N M DinjensDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLPAMM · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is typically diagnosed in elderly with a median age of 68 years. The incidence of EAC has been rising over the last decades, also among young adults. The aim of the study was to investigate whether early onset EAC is a distinct molecular entity. To identify early onset EACs, the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA) was searched. Twenty-eight tumors of patients aged ≤40 years were selected and matched with 27 tumors of patients aged ≥68 years. DNA was isolated from surgically resected specimen and sequenced on the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine with the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Panel. No differences in mutational load between early onset and conventional EACs were observed (P=0.196). The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (73%) and P16 (16%). Additional mutations in early onset EACs occurred exclusively in: APC, CDH1, CTNNB1, FGFR2, and STK11. In the conventional EACs additional mutations were exclusively identified in: ABL1, FBXW7, GNA11, GNAS, KRAS, MET, SMAD4, and VHL. Additional mutations besides TP53 and P16 seem to occur in different genes related to cell fate pathways for early onset EACs, while the additional mutations in conventional EACs are related to survival pathways.

Indexed as

early onset canceresophageal adenocarcinomamolecular analysis

Identifiers

PMID26973859
PMCPMC4751915
OpenAlexW2297079050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.