Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26973754›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2016

Computerized Diagnostic Assistant for the Automatic Detection of Pneumothorax on Ultrasound: A Pilot Study.

Shane M Summers, Eric J Chin, Brit J Long, Ronald D Grisell, John G Knight, Kurt W Grathwohl, John L Ritter, Jeffrey D Morgan, Jose Salinas, Lorne H Blackbourne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shane M SummersBrooke Army Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio, Texas.
Eric J ChinBrooke Army Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio, Texas.
Brit J LongBrooke Army Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio, Texas.
Ronald D GrisellUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research, San Antonio, Texas.
John G KnightBrooke Army Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio, Texas.
Kurt W GrathwohlBrooke Army Medical Center, Department of Pulmonary/Critical Care, San Antonio, Texas.
John L RitterBrooke Army Medical Center, Department of Radiology, San Antonio, Texas.
Jeffrey D MorganBrooke Army Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio, Texas.
Jose SalinasUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research, San Antonio, Texas.
Lorne H BlackbourneUnited States Army Medical Department Center and School.
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research · USSan Antonio Military Medical Center · USWilford Hall Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBedside thoracic ultrasound (US) can rapidly diagnose pneumothorax (PTX) with improved accuracy over the physical examination and without the need for chest radiography (CXR); however, US is highly operator dependent. A computerized diagnostic assistant was developed by the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research to detect PTX on standard thoracic US images. This computer algorithm is designed to automatically detect sonographic signs of PTX by systematically analyzing B-mode US video clips for pleural sliding and M-mode still images for the seashore sign. This was a pilot study to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the PTX detection computer algorithm when compared to an expert panel of US trained physicians.

methodsThis was a retrospective study using archived thoracic US obtained on adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) between 5/23/2011 and 8/6/2014. Emergency medicine residents, fellows, attending physicians, physician assistants, and medical students performed the US examinations and stored the images in the picture archive and communications system (PACS). The PACS was queried for all ED bedside US examinations with reported positive PTX during the study period along with a random sample of negatives. The computer algorithm then interpreted the images, and we compared the results to an independent, blinded expert panel of three physicians, each with experience reviewing over 10,000 US examinations.

resultsQuery of the PACS system revealed 146 bedside thoracic US examinations for analysis. Thirteen examinations were indeterminate and were excluded. There were 79 true negatives, 33 true positives, 9 false negatives, and 12 false positives. The test characteristics of the algorithm when compared to the expert panel were sensitivity 79% (95 % CI [63-89]) and specificity 87% (95% CI [77-93]). For the 20 images scored as highest quality by the expert panel, the algorithm demonstrated 100% sensitivity (95% CI [56-100]) and 92% specificity (95% CI [62-100]).

conclusionThis novel computer algorithm has potential to aid clinicians with the identification of the sonographic signs of PTX in the absence of expert physician sonographers. Further refinement and training of the algorithm is still needed, along with prospective validation, before it can be utilized in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPoint-of-Care SystemsUltrasonographyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaliforniaDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPneumothoraxRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26973754
PMCPMC4786248
OpenAlexW2289460188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.