ArticleEvolution2009
Assessment of Biology Majors' Versus Nonmajors' Views on Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent Design.
Article in Evolution, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Do Biology MajorsCBE life sciences education · 2017Article
- Evolution Controversy: A Phenomenon Prompted by the Incompatibility between Science and Religious Beliefs.The international journal of science in society · 2015Article
- Educators of Prospective Teachers Hesitate to Embrace Evolution Due to Deficient Understanding of Science/Evolution and High Religiosity.Evolution · 2012Article
- The Jackprot Simulation Couples Mutation Rate with Natural Selection to Illustrate How Protein Evolution Is Not Random.Evolution · 2011Article
- New England Faculty and College Students Differ in Their Views About Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design, and Religiosity.Evolution · 2011Article
- Acceptance of Evolution Increases with Student Academic Level: A Comparison Between a Secular and a Religious College.Evolution · 2009Article
- Introduction: why people do not accept evolution: using protistan diversity to promote evolution literacy.The Journal of eukaryotic microbiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The controversy around evolution, creationism, and intelligent design resides in a historical struggle between scientific knowledge and popular belief. Four hundred seventy-six students (biology majors
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.