Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26973646›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2016

Human NK Cell Diversity in Viral Infection: Ramifications of Ramification.

Dara M Strauss-Albee, Catherine A Blish

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PolyoxidoniumFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Generation of non-genetically modified, CAR-like, NK cells.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The role of NK cells in fighting the virus infection and sepsis.International journal of medical sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dara M Strauss-AlbeeStanford Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, CA , USA.
Catherine A BlishStanford Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Modeling the influence of sex on natural killer cell networksDP2AI112193 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLISH, CATHERINE A · 2013 to 2015
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS DP2 AI112193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells are a unique lymphocyte lineage with remarkable agility in the rapid destruction of virus-infected cells. They are also the most poorly understood class of lymphocyte. A spectrum of activating and inhibitory receptors at the NK cell surface leads to an unusual and difficult-to-study mechanism of cellular recognition, as well as a very high capacity for diversity at the single-cell level. Here, we review the evidence for the role of NK cells in the earliest stage of human viral infection, and in its prevention. We argue that single-cell diversity is a logical evolutionary adaptation for their position in the immune response and contributes to their ability to kill virus-infected cells. Finally, we look to the future, where emerging single-cell technologies will enable a new generation of rigorous and clinically relevant studies on NK cells accounting for all of their unique and diverse characteristics.

Indexed as

lymphocyte diversitymass cytometrynatural killer cellssingle-cell technologyviral susceptibility

Identifiers

PMID26973646
PMCPMC4776076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.