Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26973483›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2016

Group Intensive Cognitive Activation in Patients with Major or Mild Neurocognitive Disorder.

Simonetta Panerai, Domenica Tasca, Sabrina Musso, Valentina Catania, Federica Ruggeri, Alberto Raggi, Stefano Muratore, Giuseppina Prestianni, Cinzia Bonforte, Raffaele Ferri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Simonetta PaneraiUnit of Psychology I. C., Oasi Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging (IRCCS) Troina, Italy.
Domenica TascaUnit of Psychology I. C., Oasi Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging (IRCCS) Troina, Italy.
Sabrina MussoUnit of Psychology I. C., Oasi Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging (IRCCS) Troina, Italy.
Valentina CataniaUnit of Psychology I. C., Oasi Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging (IRCCS) Troina, Italy.
Federica RuggeriUnit of Psychology I. C., Oasi Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging (IRCCS) Troina, Italy.
Alberto RaggiUnit of Neurology, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital Forlì, Italy.
Stefano MuratoreUnit of Psychology I. C., Oasi Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging (IRCCS) Troina, Italy.
Giuseppina PrestianniUnit of Psychology I. C., Oasi Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging (IRCCS) Troina, Italy.
Cinzia BonforteUnit of Psychology I. C., Oasi Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging (IRCCS) Troina, Italy.
Raffaele FerriUnit of Neurology I. C., Oasi Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging (IRCCS) Troina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo standard protocols are available for cognitive rehabilitation (CR) in conditions like Major or Mild Neurocognitive disorder (M-NCD or m-NCD, respectively); however, preliminary data seem to indicate that such interventions might have cost-effective beneficial effects and are free from side effect or adverse events. Three basic approaches are known: cognitive stimulation (CS), cognitive training (CT), and CR.

objectiveAim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a protocol of group intensive cognitive activation (g-ICA) in patients with both M-NCD and m-NCD; the protocol was specifically arranged in our Research Institute, based on the principles of the central role of the patient and the mediation pedagogy. SUBJECTS AND

methodsSixteen patients with M-NCD and fifteen patients with m-NCD were enrolled, as well as eleven patients with M-NCD who were used as a control group (CG). The intervention was carried-out by a clinical neuropsychologist with daily group sessions over a period of 2 months. Neuropsychological assessment was performed at baseline and after the completion of the rehabilitative intervention.

resultsGeneral cognitive functioning, attention, ideomotor praxis and visual memory scores were found to be significantly increased in all patients. Beneficial and significant effects were also found for constructive praxis in M-NCD and for executive functioning in m-NCD. All areas of the language function were significantly ameliorated in m-NCD, while this happened only for verbal repetition and syntax-grammar comprehension in M-NCD. No changes were detected for long- and short-term verbal memory, which were found to be worsened in controls without activation.

conclusionOur findings seem to indicate that g-ICA might be effective in inducing beneficial changes on the general cognitive functioning and other specific functions in patients with both m-NCD and M-NCD. Moreover, the specific protocol proposed, even if susceptible of important improvement, is easy to carry out within hospital facilities and cost-effective.

Indexed as

cognitive stimulationcognitive trainingdementiamild cognitive impairmentpatient-focused cognitive intervention

Identifiers

PMID26973483
PMCPMC4770036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.