Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26973168›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2016

A method for real-time visual stimulus selection in the study of cortical object perception.

Daniel D Leeds, Michael J Tarr

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel D LeedsFordham University, Computer and Information Science Department, Bronx, New York, USA; Carnegie Mellon University, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: dleeds@fordham.edu.
Michael J TarrCarnegie Mellon University, Psychology Department, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Carnegie Mellon University, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: michaeltarr@cmu.edu.
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition · USFordham University · US

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCET90DA022762 · NIDA · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KASS, ROBERT E, RUBIN, JONATHAN E. · 2006 to 2020
$2.0M
Using Functional Physiology to Uncover the Fundamental Principles of Visual CorteR01MH084195 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI TARR, MICHAEL J · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS T90 DA022762NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The properties utilized by visual object perception in the mid- and high-level ventral visual pathway are poorly understood. To better establish and explore possible models of these properties, we adopt a data-driven approach in which we repeatedly interrogate neural units using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to establish each unit's image selectivity. This approach to imaging necessitates a search through a broad space of stimulus properties using a limited number of samples. To more quickly identify the complex visual features underlying human cortical object perception, we implemented a new functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol in which visual stimuli are selected in real-time based on BOLD responses to recently shown images. Two variations of this protocol were developed, one relying on natural object stimuli and a second based on synthetic object stimuli, both embedded in feature spaces based on the complex visual properties of the objects. During fMRI scanning, we continuously controlled stimulus selection in the context of a real-time search through these image spaces in order to maximize neural responses across pre-determined 1cm(3) rain regions. Elsewhere we have reported the patterns of cortical selectivity revealed by this approach (Leeds et al., 2014). In contrast, here our objective is to present more detailed methods and explore the technical and biological factors influencing the behavior of our real-time stimulus search. We observe that: 1) Searches converged more reliably when exploring a more precisely parameterized space of synthetic objects; 2) real-time estimation of cortical responses to stimuli is reasonably consistent; 3) search behavior was acceptably robust to delays in stimulus displays and subject motion effects. Overall, our results indicate that real-time fMRI methods may provide a valuable platform for continuing study of localized neural selectivity, both for visual object representation and beyond.

Indexed as

User-Computer InterfaceBiofeedback, PsychologyBrain MappingComputer SystemsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityVisual CortexYoung AdultComputational modelingFunctional magnetic resonance imagingObject recognitionReal-time signal processingReal-time stimulus selection

Identifiers

PMID26973168
PMCPMC4889505
OpenAlexW2295668252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.