Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26972993›Full record

SynthesisSeminars in arthritis and rheumatism2016

A systematic review and meta-analysis of cutaneous manifestations in late- versus early-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

Jennifer L Medlin, Karen E Hansen, Sara R Fitz, Christie M Bartels

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Early-onset lupus nephritis.Clinical kidney journal · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer L MedlinUniversity of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI.
Karen E HansenDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1625 Highland Ave #4132, Madison, WI 53705.
Sara R FitzDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Associates Clinic, Dubuque, IA.
Christie M BartelsDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1625 Highland Ave #4132, Madison, WI 53705.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Impact of Rheumatologist Communication Upon Managing Cardiovascular Risk in RAK23AR062381 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BARTELS, CHRISTIE MICHELS · 2012 to 2015
$423k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR062381NIAMS NIH HHS L30 AR063469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) most commonly occurs in reproductive-age women, some are diagnosed after the age of 50. Recognizing that greater than one-third of SLE criteria are cutaneous, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate differences in cutaneous manifestations in early- and late-onset SLE patients.

methodsWe searched the literature using PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. We excluded studies that did not include ACR SLE classification criteria, early-onset controls, that defined late-onset SLE as <50 years of age, or were not written in English. Two authors rated study quality using the Newcastle Ottawa Quality Scale. We used Forest plots to compare odds ratios (95% CI) of cutaneous manifestations by age. Study heterogeneity was assessed using I(2).

resultsOverall, 35 studies, representing 11,189 early-onset and 1727 late-onset patients with SLE, met eligibility criteria. The female:male ratio was lower in the late-onset group (5:1 versus 8:1). Most cutaneous manifestations were less prevalent in the late-onset group. In particular, malar rash [OR = 0.43 (0.35, 0.52)], photosensitivity [OR = 0.72 (0.59, 0.88)], and livedo reticularis [OR = 0.33 (0.17, 0.64)] were less common in late-onset patients. In contrast, sicca symptoms were more common [OR = 2.45 (1.91, 3.14)]. The mean Newcastle Ottawa Quality Scale score was 6.3 ± 0.5 (scale: 0-9) with high inter-rater reliability for the score (0.96).

conclusionsOverall, cutaneous manifestations are less common in late-onset SLE patients, except sicca symptoms. Future studies should investigate etiologies for this phenomenon including roles of immune senescence, environment, gender, and immunogenetics.

Indexed as

Age of OnsetAlopeciaExanthemaFemaleHumansLate Onset DisordersLivedo ReticularisLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPhotosensitivity DisordersRaynaud DiseaseSkin DiseasesVasculitisAlopeciaCutaneousLate onsetMalar rashPhotosensitivityRaynaudSiccaSystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID26972993
PMCPMC4879060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.