Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26972905›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2016

Novel identification of biofluids using a multiplex methylation-specific PCR combined with single-base extension system.

Yu-Chih Lin, Li-Chin Tsai, James Chun-I Lee, Kuo-Lan Liu, Jason Tze-Cheng Tzen, Adrian Linacre, Hsing-Mei Hsieh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yu-Chih LinGraduate Institute of Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuo Kuang Road, South District, Taichung City, 40227, Taiwan, ROC.
Li-Chin TsaiDepartment of Forensic Science, Central Police University, 56 Shu-Jen Road, Kwei-San, Taoyuan, 33304, Taiwan, ROC.
James Chun-I LeeDepartment of Forensic Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 1 Jen-Ai Road Section 1, Taipei, 10051, Taiwan, ROC.
Kuo-Lan LiuDepartment of Forensic Science, Central Police University, 56 Shu-Jen Road, Kwei-San, Taoyuan, 33304, Taiwan, ROC.
Jason Tze-Cheng TzenGraduate Institute of Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuo Kuang Road, South District, Taichung City, 40227, Taiwan, ROC.
Adrian LinacreSchool of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Hsing-Mei HsiehDepartment of Forensic Science, Central Police University, 56 Shu-Jen Road, Kwei-San, Taoyuan, 33304, Taiwan, ROC. mei@mail.cpu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeKnowledge of the composition of complex body fluid mixtures may aid forensic investigations greatly. However, many of the traditional tests are presumptive in nature and can lead to ambiguous results. The aim of this study is to establish a reliable method to identify various biofluids via analysis of their DNA methylation profiles.

methodsA total of eight biofluid-specific methylated markers for saliva, venous blood, vaginal fluids, and semen were isolated from the open database of Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. These biofluid-specific markers, a control marker to confirm bisulfite conversion, and a gender marker, were combined into a 10-plex methylation-specific PCR single-base-extension (MSP-SBE) system.

resultsAnalysis of 65 DNA samples isolated from venous blood, semen, vaginal fluid, saliva, and menstrual blood that had been treated with bisulfite, resulted in all eight markers detecting the body fluid to which they were designed. Unambiguous body fluid identification occurred from both single sources of body fluids and complex mixtures. A threshold was devised for each marker to minimize the chance of a false inclusion. The efficacy of the assay and application to forensic practice was demonstrated using five non-probative samples from real alleged sexual assault cases. The system unambiguously determined the biofluid types for the non-probative forensic samples that previously resulted in inconclusive or conflicting results using traditional tests.

conclusionsThe results demonstrated the 10-plex MSP-SBE system established in this study is both sensitive and specific when applied to body fluid identification and can be readily adopted into forensic practice.

Indexed as

Blood Chemical AnalysisDNA MethylationMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionCervix MucusFemaleForensic GeneticsGenetic MarkersHumansMaleSalivaSemenSulfitesGenetic Markershydrogen sulfiteSulfitesBiofluid identificationBody fluidsDNA methylationMethylation-specific PCR (MSP)MixturesSingle-base-extension (SBE)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.