Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26972863›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Oncology2016

Neurocognitive functioning and genetic variation in patients with primary brain tumours.

Jeffrey S Wefel, Kyle R Noll, Michael E Scheurer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Obstacles and Trials in Treating Primary Brain Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Understanding treatment preferences and cognitive outcomes in patients with gliomas.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey S WefelDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. Electronic address: jwefel@mdanderson.org.
Kyle R NollDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael E ScheurerDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Multimodal MRI Biomarker of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Breast CancerR01NR014195 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KESLER, SHELLI R, WEFEL, JEFFREY SCOTT · 2012 to 2017
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014195NINR NIH HHS R01NR014195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impairment of neurocognitive functioning is a common result of cerebral neoplasms and treatment, although there is substantial heterogeneity in the pattern and severity of neurocognitive dysfunction across individuals and tumour types. The effects of many clinical and patient characteristics on neurocognitive functioning have been documented, but little research has been devoted to understanding the effect of genetic variation on neurocognitive outcomes in patients with brain tumours. This Review highlights preliminary evidence that suggests an association between various genes and risk of adverse neurocognitive outcomes in patients with brain tumours. Studies include genes specific to neuronal function, and those associated with more systemic cellular regulation. Related scientific literature in other disease populations is briefly discussed to indicate additional candidate genes. We consider methodological issues central to the study of neurocognitive functioning and genetic associations for patients with brain tumours, and emphasise the need for future research integrating novel investigative techniques.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAdultAgedAge FactorsBrain NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesChildCognition DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID26972863
PMCPMC5215729
OpenAlexW2290211399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.