Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26972648›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2016

Focal Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation Improves Overall Survival in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Induction Chemotherapy and Consolidative Chemoradiation.

Sunil Krishnan, Awalpreet S Chadha, Yelin Suh, Hsiang-Chun Chen, Arvind Rao, Prajnan Das, Bruce D Minsky, Usama Mahmood, Marc E Delclos, Gabriel O Sawakuchi and 7 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 219 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
219citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03652428 phase1 / phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Phase I Study of Concurrent Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine With Hypofractionated, Ablative Proton Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreRan2019 to 2026Enrolled24ConditionsLocally Advanced Pancreatic CancerArmsGemcitabine, Hypofractionated Ablative Proton Therapy
NCT04199754 early_phase1terminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study of Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CT) in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled6ConditionsPelvic Cancer, Abdominal CancerArmsOmnipaque 300mg/mL Solution for Injection, Cone Beam CT, Radiation Therapy, 0.9% Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

219 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

159 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sunil KrishnanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: skrishnan@mdanderson.org.
Awalpreet S ChadhaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
Yelin SuhDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
Hsiang-Chun ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Arvind RaoDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Prajnan DasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
Bruce D MinskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
Usama MahmoodDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
Marc E DelclosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
Gabriel O SawakuchiDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
Sam BeddarDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
Matthew H KatzDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jason B FlemingDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Milind M JavleDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Gauri R VaradhacharyDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Robert A WolffDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Christopher H CraneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Kathrin Milbury · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA16672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients treated with dose-escalated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with curative intent. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 200 patients with LAPC were treated with induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation between 2006 and 2014. Of these, 47 (24%) having tumors >1 cm from the luminal organs were selected for dose-escalated IMRT (biologically effective dose [BED] >70 Gy) using a simultaneous integrated boost technique, inspiration breath hold, and computed tomographic image guidance. Fractionation was optimized for coverage of gross tumor and luminal organ sparing. A 2- to 5-mm margin around the gross tumor volume was treated using a simultaneous integrated boost with a microscopic dose. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), local-regional and distant RFS, and time to local-regional and distant recurrence, calculated from start of chemoradiation, were the outcomes of interest.

resultsMedian radiation dose was 50.4 Gy (BED = 59.47 Gy) with a concurrent capecitabine-based (86%) regimen. Patients who received BED >70 Gy had a superior OS (17.8 vs 15.0 months, P=.03), which was preserved throughout the follow-up period, with estimated OS rates at 2 years of 36% versus 19% and at 3 years of 31% versus 9% along with improved local-regional RFS (10.2 vs 6.2 months, P=.05) as compared with those receiving BED ≤70 Gy. Degree of gross tumor volume coverage did not seem to affect outcomes. No additional toxicity was observed in the high-dose group. Higher dose (BED) was the only predictor of improved OS on multivariate analysis.

conclusionRadiation dose escalation during consolidative chemoradiation therapy after induction chemotherapy for LAPC patients improves OS and local-regional RFS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreath HoldingChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreatic NeoplasmsRadiography

Identifiers

PMID26972648
PMCPMC4792191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.