Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26972558›Full record

ReviewBlood reviews2016

Update on rational targeted therapy in AML.

Danielle Shafer, Steven Grant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Selective Aurora A-TPX2 Interaction Inhibitors HaveJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Enhancing venetoclax activity in hematological malignancies.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Danielle ShaferVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: dashafer@vcu.edu.
Steven GrantVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Funding

Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Kim Felder Rhoads · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
Targeting AML with PI3K/AKT inhibitors and BH3-mimeticsR01CA167708 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI GRANT, STEVEN · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
Wee1 and HDAC inhibition in relapsed/refractory AMLUH2TR001373 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI GRANT, STEVEN · 2015 to 2017
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UH2 TR001373NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059NCI NIH HHS R01 CA167708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a challenge to both patients and clinicians. Despite improvements in our understanding of the disease, treatment has changed minimally and outcomes remain poor for the majority of patients. Within the last decade, there have been an increasing number of potential targets and pathways identified for development in AML. The classes of agents described in this review include but are not limited to epigenetic modifiers such as IDH inhibitors, BET inhibitors, and HDAC inhibitors as well as cell cycle and signaling inhibitors such as Aurora kinase inhibitors and CDK inhibitors. While the developments are encouraging, it is unlikely that targeting a single pathway will result in long-term disease control. Accordingly, we will also highlight potential rational partners for the novel agents described herein.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAntineoplastic AgentsAurora kinaseBETBH3-mimeticDOT1LFlavopiridolHDAC inhibitorsHedgehogHigh-risk AMLIdasanutlinIDHLSD1PalbociclibPevonedistatRigosertibTosedostatVenetoclaxVolasertibWee1

Identifiers

PMID26972558
PMCPMC4956515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.