Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26972459›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2016

Entrainment in up and down states of neural populations: non-smooth and stochastic models.

Zachary T McCleney, Zachary P Kilpatrick

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zachary T McCleneyDepartment of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
Zachary P KilpatrickDepartment of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. zpkilpat@math.uh.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2835-9416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slow oscillations in firing rate of neural populations are commonly observed during slow wave sleep. These oscillations are partitioned into up and down states, where the population switches between high and low firing rates (Sanchez-Vives and McCormick in Nat Neurosci 3:1027-1034, 2000). Transitions between up and down states can be synchronized at considerably long ranges (Volgushev et al. in J Neurosci 26:5665-5672, 2006). To explore how external perturbations shape the phase of slow oscillations, we analyze a reduced model of up and down state transitions involving a population neural activity variable and a global adaptation variable. The adaptation variable represents the average of all the slow hyperpolarizing currents received by neurons in a large population. Recurrent connectivity leads to a bistable neural population, where a low firing rate state coexists with a high firing rate state, where persistent activity is maintained via excitatory connections. Adaptation eventually inactivates the high activity state, and the low activity state then persists until adaptation has significantly decayed. We analyze the phase response of the rate model by taking advantage of the separation of timescales between the fast activity and slow adaptation variables. This analysis reveals that perturbations to the neural activity variable have a considerably weaker effect on the oscillation phase than adaptation perturbations. When noise is not incorporated into the rate model, the period of the slow oscillation is determined by the timescale of the slow adaptation variable. In the presence of noise, times at which the population transitions between the low and high activity states become variable. This is because the rise and decay of the adaptation variable is now stochastically-driven, leading to a distribution of transition times. Interestingly, common noise in the adaptation variable can lead to a correlation of two distinct slow oscillating populations. This effect is still significant in the event that each population contains its own local sources of noise. We also show this phenomenon can occur a spiking network. Our results demonstrate the relative contributions of excitatory input and hyperpolarizing current fluctuations on the phase of slow oscillations.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeuronsStochastic ProcessesNeural adaptationPhase sensitivity functionStochastic synchrony

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.