Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26972427›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Predictors for surgical complications of en bloc resections in the spine: review of 220 cases treated by the same team.

Stefano Boriani, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Stefano Bandiera, Riccardo Ghermandi, Ran Lador

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Two-step osteotomy/discectomy through cannulated screw (TOCS) technique for en bloc resection of spine tumor: surgical technique and preliminary results.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefano BorianiDepartment of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro GasbarriniDepartment of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano BandieraDepartment of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Riccardo GhermandiDepartment of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Ran LadorSpine Surgery Unit, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, 6 Weizman St., 64239, Tel-Aviv, Israel. ranilador@gmail.com.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIdentify risk factors, enabling reduction of the rate of complications and improve outcome in en bloc resection surgeries.

methodsA retrospective study of prospective collected data of 1681 patients affected by spine tumors treated from 1990 to 2015 by the same team.

resultsA total of 220 en bloc resections that were performed on 216 patients during that period. Most of the tumors were primary-165 cases (43 benign and 122 malignant), metastases occurred in 55 cases. Median FU was 45 months (0-371). 153 complications were observed in 100 patients (46.2 %). 64 (30 %) suffered one complication, while the rest had two or more. There were 105 major and 48 minor complications. Seven patients (4.6 %) died as a result of complications. The combined approach, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy were statistically significant independent risk factors for complications occurrence. 33 patients (15.2 %) suffered from local recurrence. Reoperations were mostly due to tumor recurrences, but also to hardware failures, wound dehiscence, hematomas and aortic dissection.

conclusionThe rate of complication is higher in multisegmental resections and when double combined approach is performed. Reoperations display greater morbidity owing to dissection through scar/fibrosis from previous operations and possibly from RT. Careful treatment planning and, in the event of uncertainty, referral to a specialty center must be stressed. The high risk of complications should not discourage surgeons from performing en bloc resection when needed. Most of the patients who sustain complications benefit from the better local control resulting from en bloc resection.

Indexed as

Neurosurgical ProceduresHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSpinal NeoplasmsSpineComplicationsEn bloc resectionMorbiditySpine tumorsVertebrectomy

Identifiers

PMID26972427
OpenAlexW2298158114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.