Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26972334›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2016

Single oral dose safety of D-allulose in dogs.

Naohito Nishii, Toru Nomizo, Satoshi Takashima, Tatsuya Matsubara, Masaaki Tokuda, Hitoshi Kitagawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review onFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  3. The long-term safety of D-allulose administration in healthy dogs.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naohito NishiiJoint Department of Veterinary Medicine, Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Toru Nomizo
Satoshi Takashima
Tatsuya Matsubara
Masaaki Tokuda
Hitoshi Kitagawa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthy dogs were administered acute oral doses of D-allulose (also called D-psicose) to evaluate its toxicity. Six dogs received oral doses of either a placebo or D-allulose solution (1 and 4 g/kg) on three different study days. One dog experienced vomiting, and five dogs showed transient diarrhea when 4 g/kg of D-allulose was administered. All dogs were active and had a good appetite throughout the study period. Blood glucose concentration slightly decreased without a rise in plasma insulin concentration 2 hr after D-allulose administration. Plasma alkaline phosphatase activities showed a mild increase between 12 and 48 hr after D-allulose administration. These data suggested that a single oral dose of D-allulose does not show severe toxicity in dogs.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsBlood GlucoseDiarrheaDog DiseasesDogsFemaleFructoseInsulinMaleSweetening AgentsVomitingBlood GlucoseFructoseInsulinpsicoseSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID26972334
PMCPMC4937148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.