ArticleScientific reports2016
Differential network analysis reveals the genome-wide landscape of estrogen receptor modulation in hormonal cancers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- DRaCOon: a novel algorithm for pathway-level differential co-expression analysis in transcriptomics.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Interpretable AI for inference of causal molecular relationships from omics data.Science advances · 2025Article
- Patient-specific analysis of co-expression to measure biological network rewiring in individuals.Life science alliance · 2024Article
- Applying differential network analysis to longitudinal gene expression in response to perturbations.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Differential Co-Expression Analyses Allow the Identification of Critical Signalling Pathways Altered during Tumour Transformation and Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Classification of Cancer Types Using Graph Convolutional Neural Networks.Frontiers in physics · 2020Article
- An integrative multi-omics network-based approach identifies key regulators for breast cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Article
- Differential co-expression-based detection of conditional relationships in transcriptional data: comparative analysis and application to breast cancer.Genome biology · 2019Article
- Multi-omics analysis reveals theTranslational cancer research · 2019Article
- scdNet: a computational tool for single-cell differential network analysis.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- GSAE: an autoencoder with embedded gene-set nodes for genomics functional characterization.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- FACS-Seq analysis of Pax3-derived cells identifies non-myogenic lineages in the embryonic forelimb.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Differential gene regulatory networks in development and disease.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2018Review
- Genome-wide identification of key modulators of gene-gene interaction networks in breast cancer.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Higher HOPX expression is associated with distinct clinical and biological features and predicts poor prognosis inHaematologica · 2017Article
- Differential correlation analysis of glioblastoma reveals immune ceRNA interactions predictive of patient survival.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Several mutual information (MI)-based algorithms have been developed to identify dynamic gene-gene and function-function interactions governed by key modulators (genes, proteins, etc.). Due to intensive computation, however, these methods rely heavily on prior knowledge and are limited in genome-wide analysis. We present the modulated gene/gene set interaction (MAGIC) analysis to systematically identify genome-wide modulation of interaction networks. Based on a novel statistical test employing conjugate Fisher transformations of correlation coefficients, MAGIC features fast computation and adaption to variations of clinical cohorts. In simulated datasets MAGIC achieved greatly improved computation efficiency and overall superior performance than the MI-based method. We applied MAGIC to construct the estrogen receptor (ER) modulated gene and gene set (representing biological function) interaction networks in breast cancer. Several novel interaction hubs and functional interactions were discovered. ER+ dependent interaction between TGFβ and NFκB was further shown to be associated with patient survival. The findings were verified in independent datasets. Using MAGIC, we also assessed the essential roles of ER modulation in another hormonal cancer, ovarian cancer. Overall, MAGIC is a systematic framework for comprehensively identifying and constructing the modulated interaction networks in a whole-genome landscape. MATLAB implementation of MAGIC is available for academic uses at https://github.com/chiuyc/MAGIC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.