ArticleCytotherapy2016
Cardiopulmonary and histological characterization of an acute rat lung injury model demonstrating safety of mesenchymal stromal cell infusion.
Article in Cytotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility, Safety, and Tolerance of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Obstructive Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction.Stem cells translational medicine · 2018Trial
- Anti-Semaphorin-7A single chain antibody demonstrates beneficial effects on pulmonary inflammation during acute lung injury.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Systemic Sclerosis: Allogenic or Autologous Approaches for Therapeutic Use?Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
- Biodistribution and Clearance of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Quantitative Three-Dimensional Cryo-Imaging After Intravenous Infusion in a Rat Lung Injury Model.Stem cells translational medicine · 2016Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells are sensitive to bleomycin treatment.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND
aimsIn the field of cellular therapy, potential cell entrapment in the lungs following intravenous administration in a compromised or injured pulmonary system is an important concern that requires further investigation. We developed a rat model of inflammatory and fibrotic lung disease to mimic the human clinical condition of obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) and evaluate the safety of intravenous infusion of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). This model was used to obtain appropriate safety information and functional characterization to support the translation of an ex vivo-generated cellular product into human clinical trials. To overcome spontaneous recovery and size limitations associated with current animal models, we used a novel multiple dose bleomycin strategy to induce lasting lung injury in rats.
methodsIntratracheal instillation of bleomycin was administered to rats on multiple days. MSCs were intravenously infused 7 days apart. Detailed pulmonary function tests including forced expiratory volume, total lung capacity, and invasive hemodynamic measurements were conducted to define the representative disease model and monitor cardiopulmonary hemodynamic consequences of the cell infusion. Post-euthanasia assessments included a thorough evaluation of lung morphology and histopathology.
resultsThe double dose bleomycin instillation regimen resulted in severe and irreversible lung injury and fibrosis. Cardiopulmonary physiological monitoring reveled that no adverse events could be attributed to the cell infusion process. DISCUSSION: Although our study did not show the infusion of MSCs to result in an improvement in lung function or rescue of damaged tissue this study does confirm the safety of MSC infusion into damaged lungs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.