ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2016
Modular protein domains: an engineering approach toward functional biomaterials.
Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-channel optogenetics in yeast for multiplexed light-based control of cellular processes and pathways.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Structure-guided design of a novel, stable, and soluble Cecropin A variant for antimicrobial therapeutic applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Endolysins and membrane-active peptides: innovative engineering strategies against gram-negative bacteria.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Open-endedness in synthetic biology: A route to continual innovation for biological design.Science advances · 2024Review
- Cell Microencapsulation Within Engineered Hyaluronan Elastin-Like Protein (HELP) Hydrogels.Current protocols · 2023Article
- Advantages and Prospective Implications of Smart Materials in Tissue Engineering: Piezoelectric, Shape Memory, and Hydrogels.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling-based quantitative proteomic analysis reveals the cellular protein characteristics of 16HBE cells infected with coxsackievirus A10 and the potential effect of HMGB1 on viral replication.Archives of virology · 2023Article
- Modular Design for Proteins Assembling into Antifouling Coatings: Case of Gold Surfaces.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2023Article
- Article
- Probing ion channel functional architecture and domain recombination compatibility by massively parallel domain insertion profiling.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Structure, self-assembly, and properties of a truncated reflectin variant.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Protein-Engineered Functional Materials.Advanced healthcare materials · 2019Review
- The past, present and future of protein-based materials.Open biology · 2018Article
- Production of protein-based polymers in Pichia pastoris.Biotechnology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein domains and peptide sequences are a powerful tool for conferring specific functions to engineered biomaterials. Protein sequences with a wide variety of functionalities, including structure, bioactivity, protein-protein interactions, and stimuli responsiveness, have been identified, and advances in molecular biology continue to pinpoint new sequences. Protein domains can be combined to make recombinant proteins with multiple functionalities. The high fidelity of the protein translation machinery results in exquisite control over the sequence of recombinant proteins and the resulting properties of protein-based materials. In this review, we discuss protein domains and peptide sequences in the context of functional protein-based materials, composite materials, and their biological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.