Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26971397›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Discovery of a Novel Seminal Fluid Microbiome and Influence of Estrogen Receptor Alpha Genetic Status.

Angela B Javurek, William G Spollen, Amber M Mann Ali, Sarah A Johnson, Dennis B Lubahn, Nathan J Bivens, Karen H Bromert, Mark R Ellersieck, Scott A Givan, Cheryl S Rosenfeld

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Semen Microbiome, Male Infertility, and Reproductive Health.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. The ProbioticsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela B JavurekBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
William G SpollenBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Amber M Mann AliBiochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Sarah A JohnsonBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Dennis B LubahnBiochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Nathan J BivensDNA Core Facility, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Karen H BromertDNA Core Facility, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Mark R EllersieckAgriculture Experimental Station-Statistics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Scott A GivanBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Cheryl S RosenfeldBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
University of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria harbored in the male reproductive system may influence reproductive function and health of the male and result in developmental origins of adult health and disease (DOHaD) effects in his offspring. Such effects could be due to the seminal fluid, which is slightly basic and enriched with carbohydrates; thereby, creating an ideal habitat for microbes or a potential seminal fluid microbiome (SFM). Using wild-type (WT) and estrogen receptor-alpha (ESR1) knockout (KO) male mice, we describe a unique SFM whose inhabitants differ from gut microbes. The bacterial composition of the SFM is influenced according to whether mice have functional Esr1 genes. Propionibacterium acnes, causative agent of chronic prostatitis possibly culminating in prostate cancer, is reduced in SFM of ESR1 KO compared to WT mice (P ≤ 0.0007). In certain genetic backgrounds, WT mice show a greater incidence of prostate cancer than ESR1 KO, which may be due to increased abundance of P. acnes. Additionally, select gut microbiome residents in ESR1 KO males, such as Lachnospiraceae and Christensenellaceae, might contribute to previously identified phenotypes, especially obesity, in these mutant mice. Understanding how genetics and environmental factors influence the SFM may provide the next frontier in male reproductive disorders and possibly paternal-based DOHaD diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacillotaBacteriaDNA, BacterialEstrogen Receptor alphaFecesGenotypeHost-Pathogen InteractionsMaleMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMice, KnockoutMicrobiotaObesityPropionibacterium acnesProstatic NeoplasmsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialEstrogen Receptor alphaRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26971397
PMCPMC4789797
OpenAlexW2315133059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.