Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26971254›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2017

Mechanisms of memory storage in a model perirhinal network.

Pranit Samarth, John M Ball, Gunes Unal, Denis Paré, Satish S Nair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pranit SamarthDivision of Biological Sciences and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
John M BallDivision of Biological Sciences and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Gunes UnalCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Denis ParéCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Satish S NairDivision of Biological Sciences and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. nairs@missouri.edu.

Funding

Associative properties of the perirhinal networkR01MH073610 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI PARE, DENIS · 2005 to 2013
$3.0M
Midline thalamic control of the amygdalaR01MH107239 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI PARE, DENIS · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Functional Organization of the Bed Nucleus of the Stria TerminalisR01MH098738 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI PARE, DENIS · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
CRCNS: Modeling Acquisition and Extinction of Fear Memories in Amygdala CircuitsR01MH087755 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI NAIR, SATISH S · 2009 to 2011
$728k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073610NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087755NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098738NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perirhinal cortex supports recognition and associative memory. Prior unit recording studies revealed that recognition memory involves a reduced responsiveness of perirhinal cells to familiar stimuli whereas associative memory formation is linked to increasing perirhinal responses to paired stimuli. Both effects are thought to depend on perirhinal plasticity but it is unclear how the same network could support these opposite forms of plasticity. However, a recent study showed that when neocortical inputs are repeatedly activated, depression or potentiation could develop, depending on the extent to which the stimulated neocortical activity recruited intrinsic longitudinal connections. We developed a biophysically realistic perirhinal model that reproduced these phenomena and used it to investigate perirhinal mechanisms of associative memory. These analyzes revealed that associative plasticity is critically dependent on a specific subset of neurons, termed conjunctive cells (CCs). When the model network was trained with spatially distributed but coincident neocortical inputs, CCs acquired excitatory responses to the paired inputs and conveyed them to distributed perirhinal sites via longitudinal projections. CC ablation during recall abolished expression of the associative memory. However, CC ablation during training did not prevent memory formation because new CCs emerged, revealing that competitive synaptic interactions governs the formation of CC assemblies.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronal PlasticityAction PotentialsAnimalsHumansInterneuronsMemoryNeuronsPerirhinal CortexAssociative memoryComputational modelEntorhinalMemory retrievalPerirhinalSynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID26971254
PMCPMC5241391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.