Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26971228›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2016

Examining the efficacy of a computer facilitated HIV prevention tool in drug court.

David S Festinger, Karen L Dugosh, Ann E Kurth, David S Metzger

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David S FestingerTreatment Research Institute, 600 Public Ledger Building, 150 S. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106, United States. Electronic address: dfestinger@tresearch.org.
Karen L DugoshTreatment Research Institute, 600 Public Ledger Building, 150 S. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106, United States.
Ann E KurthNew York University School of Nursing & College of Global Public Health, 41 East 11th Street, New York, NY 10003, United States.
David S MetzgerTreatment Research Institute, 600 Public Ledger Building, 150 S. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106, United States; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Treatment Research Institute · USNew York University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Virus & Reservoirs CoreP30AI045008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVID S METZGER · 1999 to 2026
$78.6M
Penn Mental Health AIDS Research CenterP30MH097488 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Karine Dube · 2013 to 2026
$23.5M
Delivering HIV Risk Reduction Services in Drug CourtR01DA030257 · NIDA · TREATMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FESTINGER, DAVID S · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI045008NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030257NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA-030257NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH097488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough they have demonstrated efficacy in reducing substance use and criminal recidivism, competing priorities and limited resources may preclude drug court programs from formally addressing HIV risk. This study examined the efficacy of a brief, three-session, computer-facilitated HIV prevention intervention in reducing HIV risk among adult felony drug court participants.

methodsTwo hundred participants were randomly assigned to an HIV intervention (n=101) or attention control (n=99) group. All clients attended judicial status hearings approximately every six weeks. At the first three status hearings following study entry, clients in the intervention group completed the computerized, interactive HIV risk reduction sessions while those in the control group viewed a series of educational life-skill videos of matched length. Outcomes included the rate of independently obtained HIV testing, engagement in high risk HIV-related behaviors, and rate of condom procurement from the research site at each session.

resultsResults indicated that participants who received the HIV intervention were significantly more likely to report having obtained HIV testing at some point during the study period than those in the control condition, although the effect was marginally significant when examined in a longitudinal model. In addition, they had higher rates of condom procurement. No group differences were found on rates of high-risk sexual behavior, and the low rate of injection drug reported precluded examination of high-risk drug-related behavior.

conclusionsThe study provides support for the feasibility and utility of delivering HIV prevention services to drug court clients using an efficient computer-facilitated program.

Indexed as

ComputersCriminal LawRisk Reduction BehaviorSubstance-Related DisordersAdultCondomsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnsafe SexYoung AdultComputerized interventionDrug courtHIV

Identifiers

PMID26971228
PMCPMC5824990
OpenAlexW2287673380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.