Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26971106›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

Authorship in the field of femoroacetabular impingement: an analysis of journal publications.

A Duong, J Kay, M Khan, N Simunovic, O R Ayeni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The impact of surgical randomised controlled trials on the management of FAI syndrome: a citation analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A DuongDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
J KayMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
M KhanDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
N SimunovicDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
O R AyeniMcMaster University Medical Center, 1200 Main St W, Room 4E15, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada. ayenif@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review provides a bibliometric analysis of the contributors to the field of FAI research.

methodsA comprehensive search of three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed) was performed to identify all clinical research articles on the topic of FAI (from inception to 2015). Cadaveric and animal studies were excluded. Study characteristics including authors, residing country of corresponding author, and journal were abstracted from the respective databases.

resultsIn total, 1073 articles were included in this review. There were a total of 5471 different authors who contributed to the field of FAI research, 28.3 % of whom were only published in one article. The top 20 authors were associated with over half of all publications, and research studies were typically performed in their countries of residence. The greatest proportion of FAI-related articles was published in the Journal of Arthroscopy and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

conclusionsThe number of authors contributing to FAI research is increasing, suggesting not only increasing prevalence of FAI treatment among orthopaedic surgeons but also increasing interest among hip arthroscopists in furthering understanding regarding the diagnosis and management of the condition. The number of publications produced by the top 20 authors (and their affiliated countries: USA, Switzerland, Canada, and the UK) is expected to contribute to a majority of future publications. Current trends suggest that the quality of evidence will continue to improve in the near future, as large-scale, collaborative studies are currently underway. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective study, Level IV.

Indexed as

AuthorshipBibliometricsFemoracetabular ImpingementHumansPublishingRetrospective StudiesAuthorshipBibliometric reviewFemoroacetabular impingement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.