Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26971098›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2017

Ocular response analyser measurements and central corneal thickness in ocular rosacea patients.

Melis Palamar, Cumali Degirmenci, Ilgen Ertam, Ayse Yagci

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06924697 (Effect of Glucagon-like Peptide-1), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06924697 naenrolling by invitationstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonist Stimulation on Smoking Consumption in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Parallel -Controlled Clinical Trial

Ran2025Enrolled46Registered outcomes6Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Nicotine Dependence, CigarettesArmsApplication of GLP-1RAs drugs, DPP-4i group
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melis PalamarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey. melispalamar@hotmail.com.
Cumali DegirmenciDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Ilgen ErtamDepartment of Dermatology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Ayse YagciDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Ege University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rosacea is a chronic cutaneous disorder which is known to cause inflammation and increased proteolytic activity on the ocular surface that might lead to corneal biomechanical alterations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties of ocular rosacea patients and compare the measurements with healthy individuals as measured with Reichert ocular response analyser (ORA). Besides full eye examination [best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP-G)], central corneal thickness (CCT), and ORA [corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), Goldmann correlated IOP (IOPg)] measurements of 30 eyes of 15 ocular rosacea patients (study group) and 30 eyes of 15 healthy individuals (control group) were performed. For comparisons paired t test was used. Mean age of study group was 45.26 ± 11.65 (range 25 and 63) and control group was 45.00 ± 8.91 (range 26 and 58) years (p = 0.865). No significant difference in BCVA, CCT, IOP-G, IOPcc was detected among groups. However, IOPg, CH, and CRF in the study group were significantly lower than in the control group (p = 0.013, p = 0.013, p = 0.009, respectively). IOPg, CH, and CRF parameters of ocular rosacea patients were significantly lower than normal individuals. These differences and their probable clinical reflections that might effect making decisions in conditions such as glaucoma should be investigated in larger number of patients.

Indexed as

AdultBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesCorneaFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRosaceaTonometry, OcularVisual AcuityCorneal hysteresisCorneal resistance factorOcular response analyserOcular rosacea

Identifiers

PMID26971098
OpenAlexW2295248244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.