Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26970772›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2017

Immigrant screening for latent tuberculosis in Norway: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Fredrik Salvesen Haukaas, Trude Margrete Arnesen, Brita Askeland Winje, Eline Aas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cost-effectiveness of the latent tuberculosis screening program for migrants in Stockholm Region.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fredrik Salvesen HaukaasDomain for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404 Nydalen, Oslo, Norway. fredrikhaukaas@gmail.com.
Trude Margrete ArnesenDomain for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404 Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.
Brita Askeland WinjeDomain for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404 Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.
Eline AasDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute for Health and Society, University of Oslo, Postboks 1089, 0317, Blindern, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of tuberculosis (TB) disease has increased in Norway since the mid-1990s. Immigrants are screened, and some are treated, for latent TB infection (LTBI) to prevent TB disease (reactivation). In this study, we estimated the costs of both treating and screening for LTBI and TB disease, which has not been done previously in Norway. We developed a model to indicate the cost-effectiveness of four different screening algorithms for LTBI using avoided TB disease cases as the health outcome. Further, we calculated the expected value of perfect information (EVPI), and indicated areas of LTBI screening that could be changed to improve cost-effectiveness. The costs of treating LTBI and TB disease were estimated to be €1938 and €15,489 per case, respectively. The model evaluates four algorithms, and suggests three cost-effective algorithms depending on the cost-effectiveness threshold. Screening all immigrants with interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) requires the highest threshold (€28,400), followed by the algorithms "IGRA on immigrants with risk factors" and "no LTBI screening." EVPI is approximately €5 per screened immigrant. The costs for a cohort of 20,000 immigrants followed through 10 years range from €12.2 million for the algorithm "screening and treatment for TB disease but no LTBI screening," to €14 million for "screening all immigrants for both TB disease and LTBI with IGRA." The results suggest that the cost of TB disease screening and treatment is the largest contributor to total costs, while LTBI screening and treatment costs are relatively small. Increasing the proportion of IGRA-positive immigrants who are treated decreases the costs per avoided case substantially.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsHealth Care CostsAlgorithmsAntitubercular AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision TreesHumansInterferon-gamma Release TestsLatent TuberculosisNorwayRisk AssessmentTuberculin TestTuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsCEACost-effectiveness analysisEconomic evaluationEVPIExpected value of perfect informationIGRAImmigrantsInterferon gamma release assayLatent tuberculosisNorwayScreeningTSTTuberculin skin testTuberculosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.