Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26970543›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2016

Hired crop worker injuries on farms in the United States: A comparison of two survey periods from the National Agricultural Workers Survey.

Theresa R Tonozzi, Larry A Layne

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Occupational health of Iranian farmworkers: A public health priority.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Theresa R TonozziAssociation of Schools and Programs of Public Health, Washington, District of Columbia.
Larry A LayneCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999PHS HHS U36/CCU300430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHired crop workers in the United States are at high risk of occupational injury. Targeted surveillance is important for effective occupational safety efforts.

methodsThe National Agricultural Workers Survey was utilized to collect injury data during the years 1999, 2002-2004 (period I) and 2008-2010 (period II).

resultsThe overall injury rate declined between the two periods from 4.3 to 2.9/100 per full-time week-based equivalents (FTEWB ). Injury rates remained high during both periods for those with greater than 20 years farm experience (3.6 and 3.8/100 FTEWB ) and pesticide handling work (4.9 and 5.0/100 FTEWB ). Overexertion, contact with objects and equipment, and falls from height were common during both periods. Older workers comprised a greater proportion of injury cases in period II.

conclusionOverexertion that leads to sprains/strains, dangerous ladder use, and pesticide use should be targeted as important risk exposures on the farm.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsContusionsCrop ProductionEmploymentFemaleFractures, BoneHumansLacerationsMaleMiddle AgedOccupational InjuriesPesticidesPhysical ExertionPesticidescrop workersfarm laborforeign-born workersinjury rateoccupational injuries

Identifiers

PMID26970543
PMCPMC4828281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.