Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26970383›Full record

SynthesisBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2016

Steroids Versus Steroids Plus Additional Agent in Frontline Treatment of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Armin Rashidi, John F DiPersio, Brenda M Sandmaier, Graham A Colditz, Daniel J Weisdorf

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Graft-Versus-Host Disease Mouse Models: A Clinical-Translational Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Brief ReviewTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Outcomes and Predictors of Response in Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019
    Article
  18. Amphiregulin in intestinal acute graft-versus-host disease: a possible diagnostic and prognostic aid.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
  19. Current approaches to prevent and treat GVHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Armin RashidiSection of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Leukemia, Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: arashidi@dom.wustl.edu.
John F DiPersioSection of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Leukemia, Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Brenda M SandmaierClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Graham A ColditzDivision of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Daniel J WeisdorfThe Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
Easy-to-read Informed Consent for HCT Clinical TrialsU10HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2011 to 2016
$43.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL069294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive research in the last few decades, progress in treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), has been limited and steroids continue to be the standard frontline treatment. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have failed to find a beneficial effect of escalating immunosuppression using additional agents. Considering the small number of RCTs, limited sample sizes, and frequent early termination because of anticipated futility, we conducted a systematic review and an aggregate data meta-analysis to explore whether a true efficacy signal has been missed because of the limitations of individual RCTs. Seven reports met our inclusion criteria. The control arm in all studies was 2 mg/kg/day prednisone (or equivalent). The additional agent(s) used in the experimental arm(s) were higher-dose steroids, antithymocyte globulin, infliximab, anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody (daclizumab and BT563), CD5-specific immunotoxin, and mycophenolate mofetil. Random effects meta-analysis revealed no efficacy signal in pooled response rates at various times points. Overall survival at 100 days was significantly worse in the experimental arm (relative risk [RR], .83; 95% confidence interval [CI], .74 to .94; P = .004, data from 3 studies) and showed a similar trend (albeit not statistically significantly) at 1 year as well (RR, .86; 95% CI, .68 to 1.09; P = .21, data from 5 studies). In conclusion, these results argue against the value of augmented generic immunosuppression beyond steroids for frontline treatment of aGVHD and emphasize the importance of developing alternative strategies. Novel forms of immunomodulation and targeted therapies against non-immune-related pathways may enhance the efficacy of steroids in this setting, and early predictive and prognostic biomarkers can help identify the subgroup of patients who would likely need treatments other than (or in addition to) generic immunosuppression.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseDrug Therapy, CombinationGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSteroidsImmunosuppressive AgentsSteroidsGraft-versus-host diseaseMeta-analysisRandomized clinical trialSteroids

Identifiers

PMID26970383
PMCPMC5045896
OpenAlexW2294760333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.