Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26970234›Full record

ReviewAging cell2016

Developing criteria for evaluation of geroprotectors as a key stage toward translation to the clinic.

Alexey Moskalev, Elizaveta Chernyagina, Vasily Tsvetkov, Alexander Fedintsev, Mikhail Shaposhnikov, Vyacheslav Krut'ko, Alex Zhavoronkov, Brian K Kennedy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aging cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Change in the Rate of Biological Aging in Response to Caloric Restriction: CALERIE Biobank Analysis.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2017
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Repurposing niclosamide to mitigate inflammaging: a review of multi-target mechanisms in cellular senescence and age-related decline.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. No winners or losers: clinical chemistry-based biological aging metrics perform similarly across cohorts and health outcomes.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An Expert Consensus Statement on Biomarkers of Aging for Use in Intervention Studies.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Studying the Geroprotective Properties of YAP/TAZ Signaling Inhibitors onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexey MoskalevEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Elizaveta ChernyaginaMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, 141700, Russia.
Vasily TsvetkovMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, 141700, Russia.
Alexander FedintsevInstitute of Biology of Komi Science Center of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, 167982, Russia.
Mikhail ShaposhnikovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Vyacheslav Krut'koInstitute for Systems Analysis, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117312, Russia.
Alex ZhavoronkovInstitute of Biology of Komi Science Center of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, 167982, Russia.
Brian K KennedyBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, 94945, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the coming decades, a massive shift in the aging segment of the population will have major social and economic consequences around the world. One way to offset this increase is to expedite the development of geroprotectors, substances that slow aging, repair age-associated damage and extend healthy lifespan, or healthspan. While over 200 geroprotectors are now reported in model organisms and some are in human use for specific disease indications, the path toward determining whether they affect aging in humans remains obscure. Translation to the clinic is hampered by multiple issues including absence of a common set of criteria to define, select, and classify these substances, given the complexity of the aging process and their enormous diversity in mechanism of action. Translational research efforts would benefit from the formation of a scientific consensus on the following: the definition of 'geroprotector', the selection criteria for geroprotectors, a comprehensive classification system, and an analytical model. Here, we review current approaches to selection and put forth our own suggested selection criteria. Standardizing selection of geroprotectors will streamline discovery and analysis of new candidates, saving time and cost involved in translation to clinic.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalAgingBiological ProductsBiomarkersHumansBiological ProductsBiomarkersagingcriteria of geroprotectorsgeroprotectorshealthspanlifespan

Identifiers

PMID26970234
PMCPMC4854916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.