Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26969618›Full record

SynthesisEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2016

Psychological treatments for depression in pre-adolescent children (12 years and younger): systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

M Azul Forti-Buratti, Rupalim Saikia, Esther L Wilkinson, Paul G Ramchandani

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Depression and anxiety in adolescents with cystic fibrosis in Brazil: prevalence, stability over time, and relationship with treatment adherence.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Observational
  4. Interventions for Young Children's Mental Health: A Review of Reviews.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M Azul Forti-BurattiThe Centre for Mental Health, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Rupalim SaikiaThe Centre for Mental Health, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Esther L WilkinsonThe Centre for Mental Health, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Paul G RamchandaniThe Centre for Mental Health, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. p.ramchandani@imperial.ac.uk.
Centre for Mental Health · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of psychological treatments for depression in pre-adolescent children, a disorder affecting 1-2 % of children in this age range. A systematic review of studies of psychological interventions to treat depressive disorder in pre-adolescent children (aged up to 12-years-old) was carried out. The primary outcome was level of depressive symptoms. Studies were found using Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Web of Knowledge databases and selected on several criteria. Only randomised controlled trials were included. Where individual studies covered a broader age range (usually including adolescents up to age 18 years), authors of those studies were contacted and requested to provide individual patient level data for those aged 12 years and younger. 2822 abstracts were reviewed, and from these 124 full text articles were reviewed, yielding 7 studies for which we were able to access appropriate data for this review. 5 of these studies evaluated cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). Combined results from these studies suggest that there is a lack of evidence that CBT is better than no treatment [standard mean difference -0.342 (95 % confidence interval -0.961, 0.278)], although the number of participants included in the trials was relatively small. The evidence for efficacy of family therapy and psychodynamic therapy is even more limited. The very limited number of participants in randomised controlled trials means that there is inconclusive evidence for the psychological treatment of depression in children aged 12 years and below. Given the prevalence and significant impact of this disorder, there is an urgent need to establish the effectiveness or otherwise of psychological intervention.

Indexed as

ChildCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionDepressive DisorderFamily TherapyHumansPsychotherapyTreatment OutcomeChildrenDepressionMeta-analysisPsychological treatmentSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID26969618
OpenAlexW2296539087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.