Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26969505›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2016

Lessons learned from respondent-driven sampling recruitment in Nairobi: experiences from the field.

Jerry Okal, Henry F Raymond, Waimar Tun, Helgar Musyoki, Sufia Dadabhai, Dita Broz, Joan Nyamu, David Kuria, Nicholas Muraguri, Scott Geibel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jerry OkalPopulation Council, Nairobi, Kenya. jokal@popcouncil.org.
Henry F RaymondSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Waimar TunPopulation Council, Washington, DC, USA.
Helgar MusyokiNational AIDS and STD Control Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sufia DadabhaiUniversity of California, San Francisco, Nairobi, Kenya.
Dita BrozDivision of Global HIV/AIDS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joan NyamuJhpiego-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
David KuriaPalladium Group, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nicholas MuraguriMinistry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Scott GeibelPopulation Council, Washington, DC, USA.
Population Council · USBritish Council · KECenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USMinistry of Health · KENational Aids Control Council · KESan Francisco Department of Public Health · USUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

HIV PREVENTION AND CARE SERVICES FOR YOUNG PEOPLE IN KENYAU62PS224506 · PS · POPULATION COUNCIL · PI KALIBALA, SAMUEL · 2004 to 2009
$3.9M
NCHHSTP CDC HHS 5U62PS224506NCHHSTP CDC HHS U62 PS224506PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespondent-driven sampling (RDS) is used in a variety of settings to study hard-to-reach populations at risk for HIV and sexually transmitted infections. However, practices leading to successful recruitment among diverse populations in low-resource settings are seldom reported. We implemented the first, integrated, bio-behavioural surveillance survey among men who have sex with men, female sex workers and people who injected drugs in Nairobi, Kenya.

methodsThe survey period was June 2010 to March 2011, with a target sample size of 600 participants per key populations. Formative research was initially conducted to assess feasibility of the survey. Weekly monitoring reports of respondent characteristics and recruitment chain graphs from NetDraw illustrated patterns and helped to fill recruitment gaps.

resultsRDS worked well with men who have sex with men and female sex workers with recruitment initiating at a desirable pace that was maintained throughout the survey. Networks of people who injected drugs were well-integrated, but recruitment was slower than the men who have sex with men and female sex workers surveys.

conclusionBy closely monitoring RDS implementation and conducting formative research, RDS studies can effectively develop and adapt strategies to improve recruitment and improve adherence to the underlying RDS theory and assumptions.

Indexed as

Sampling StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansKenyaMaleSex WorkersSubstance Abuse, IntravenousYoung AdultFemale sex workers (FSW)Field experiencesMen who have sex with men (MSM)People who injected drugs (PWID)Respondent-driven sampling (RDS)

Identifiers

PMID26969505
PMCPMC4788831
OpenAlexW2296163019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.