Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26969372›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Integrating RNA-seq and ChIP-seq data to characterize long non-coding RNAs in Drosophila melanogaster.

Mei-Ju May Chen, Li-Kai Chen, Yu-Shing Lai, Yu-Yu Lin, Dung-Chi Wu, Yi-An Tung, Kwei-Yan Liu, Hsueh-Tzu Shih, Yi-Jyun Chen, Yan-Liang Lin and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. EFFICIENT RIBOSOMAL RNA DEPLETION FROMWellcome open research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetics and bone diseases.Genetics research · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mei-Ju May ChenGenome and Systems Biology Degree Program, National Taiwan University and Academia Sinica, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
Li-Kai ChenInstitute of Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Yu-Shing LaiDepartment of Bio-Industrial Mechatronics Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
Yu-Yu LinGraduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
Dung-Chi WuDepartment of Bio-Industrial Mechatronics Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
Yi-An TungGenome and Systems Biology Degree Program, National Taiwan University and Academia Sinica, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
Kwei-Yan LiuInstitute of Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Hsueh-Tzu ShihInstitute of Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Yi-Jyun ChenInstitute of Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Yan-Liang LinSchool of Forestry and Resource Conservation, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
Li-Ting MaSchool of Forestry and Resource Conservation, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
Jian-Long HuangGraduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
Po-Chun WuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
Ming-Yi HongDepartment of Bio-Industrial Mechatronics Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
Fang-Hua ChuSchool of Forestry and Resource Conservation, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
June-Tai WuInstitute of Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 100, Taiwan. junetai.wu@gmail.com.
Wen-Hsiung LiGenome and Systems Biology Degree Program, National Taiwan University and Academia Sinica, Taipei, 106, Taiwan. whli@gate.sinica.edu.tw.
Chien-Yu ChenGenome and Systems Biology Degree Program, National Taiwan University and Academia Sinica, Taipei, 106, Taiwan. cychen@mars.csie.ntu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in sequencing technology have opened a new era in RNA studies. Novel types of RNAs such as long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been discovered by transcriptomic sequencing and some lncRNAs have been found to play essential roles in biological processes. However, only limited information is available for lncRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster, an important model organism. Therefore, the characterization of lncRNAs and identification of new lncRNAs in D. melanogaster is an important area of research. Moreover, there is an increasing interest in the use of ChIP-seq data (H3K4me3, H3K36me3 and Pol II) to detect signatures of active transcription for reported lncRNAs.

resultsWe have developed a computational approach to identify new lncRNAs from two tissue-specific RNA-seq datasets using the poly(A)-enriched and the ribo-zero method, respectively. In our results, we identified 462 novel lncRNA transcripts, which we combined with 4137 previously published lncRNA transcripts into a curated dataset. We then utilized 61 RNA-seq and 32 ChIP-seq datasets to improve the annotation of the curated lncRNAs with regards to transcriptional direction, exon regions, classification, expression in the brain, possession of a poly(A) tail, and presence of conventional chromatin signatures. Furthermore, we used 30 time-course RNA-seq datasets and 32 ChIP-seq datasets to investigate whether the lncRNAs reported by RNA-seq have active transcription signatures. The results showed that more than half of the reported lncRNAs did not have chromatin signatures related to active transcription. To clarify this issue, we conducted RT-qPCR experiments and found that ~95.24% of the selected lncRNAs were truly transcribed, regardless of whether they were associated with active chromatin signatures or not.

conclusionsIn this study, we discovered a large number of novel lncRNAs, which suggests that many remain to be identified in D. melanogaster. For the lncRNAs that are known, we improved their characterization by integrating a large number of sequencing datasets (93 sets in total) from multiple sources (lncRNAs, RNA-seq and ChIP-seq). The RT-qPCR experiments demonstrated that RNA-seq is a reliable platform to discover lncRNAs. This set of curated lncRNAs with improved annotations can serve as an important resource for investigating the function of lncRNAs in D. melanogaster.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDrosophila melanogasterMolecular Sequence AnnotationReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Long NoncodingSequence Analysis, RNAChromatinRNA, Long NoncodingActive transcriptionChIP-seqDrosophila melanogasterLong non-coding RNARNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID26969372
PMCPMC4787191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.