ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016
Uncontrolled risk factors and worsening perfusion pattern on SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in medically treated patients with stable chronic ischaemic heart disease.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFew data exist on the correlation between the effectiveness of risk factor control and the evolution of myocardial perfusion over time in patients with stable ischaemic heart disease. The aim of the study was to evaluate the changes in stress-rest myocardial perfusion in medically treated patients with stable chronic ischaemic heart disease and the relationship with risk factor control.
methodsThe study cohort included 174 consecutive patients (age 60 ± 9 years, 68 % men) undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) (study 1), who also underwent repeat evaluation (study 2) and who were clinically stable on medical therapy. Summed stress, rest and difference scores were calculated. According to the evolution of perfusion pattern from study 1 to study 2, patients were classified as improved, stable or worsened.
resultsStudy 2 was performed on average 2.7 years after study 1. Of the 174 patients, 47 (26.9 %), 53 (30.8 %) and 74 (42.5 %) were classified as stable, improved and worsened, respectively. A significant trend was observed between the number of risk factors at the time of study 1 and worsening of myocardial perfusion (24 % of patients with zero or one risk factor showed worsening, 31 % with two, and 59 % with three or more; p = 0.03). Moreover, patients with worsened perfusion had a higher number of poorly controlled risk factors.
conclusionDespite medical therapy and clinical stability, myocardial perfusion worsened in 42.5 % of patients. The risk profile was reclassified in half of the patients. Worsening occurred more frequently in patients with three or more risk factors at the time of study 1 and in those with poorly controlled risk factors at the time of study 2; in this subset of patients, even if clinically stable, reassessment after 2 years could be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26969348What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.