Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26969347›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

(18)F-FDG PET/MRI evaluation of retroperitoneal fibrosis: a simultaneous multiparametric approach for diagnosing active disease.

Verena Ruhlmann, Thorsten Dirk Poeppel, Alexander Sascha Brandt, Johannes Grüneisen, Marcus Ruhlmann, Jens Matthias Theysohn, Michael Forsting, Andreas Bockisch, Lale Umutlu

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Multimodality imaging review of retroperitoneal fibrosis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2021
    Article
  9. State of the art ofClinical and translational imaging · 2021
    Review
  10. Diffusion-weighted MRI and PET-CT in the follow up of chronic periaortitis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Verena RuhlmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. verena.ruhlmann@uk-essen.de.
Thorsten Dirk PoeppelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Alexander Sascha BrandtDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology, HELIOS Medical Center Wuppertal, University Hospital Witten/Herdecke, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
Johannes GrüneisenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Marcus RuhlmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Jens Matthias TheysohnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Michael ForstingDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Andreas BockischDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Lale UmutluDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEEssen University Hospital · DEHelios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MRI as a one-stop diagnostic procedure in the assessment of (active) idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF)

methodsA total of 22 examinations comprising a PET/CT scan followed by a PET/MRI scan in 17 patients (13 men, 4 women, age 58 ± 11 years) with histopathologically confirmed RPF at diagnosis or during follow-up under steroid therapy were analysed in correlation with laboratory inflammation markers (ESR, CRP). The patient cohort was subdivided into two groups: 6 examinations in untreated and 16 in treated patients. Tissue formations in typically periaortic localization suggestive of RPF were visually and quantitatively evaluated. The PET analysis included the assessment of SUVmax and a qualitative score for FDG uptake in RPF tissue in relation to the uptake in the liver. MRI analysis included evaluation of the T2-weighted image signal intensity, contrast enhancement and diffusion restriction (ADC values). Mean values were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. ADC, SUVmax and ESR values were correlated using Pearson's correlation.

resultsMRI analysis revealed restricted diffusion in 100 % and 56 %, hyperintense T2 signal in 100 % and 31 %, and contrast enhancement in the periaortic tissue formation suggestive of RPF in 100 % and 62.5 % in the untreated and treated patients, respectively. In the qualitative and quantitative PET analysis, statistically significant differences were found for mean FDG uptake scores (2.5 ± 0.8 in untreated patients and 1.1 ± 0.9 in treated patients) and mean SUVmax (7.8 ± 3.5 and 4.1 ± 2.2, respectively). A strong correlation was found between the ADC values and SUVmax (Pearson r   -0.65, P = 0.0019), and between ESR and CRP values and SUVmax (both r = 0.45, P = 0.061).

conclusionIntegrated (18)F-FDG PET/MRI shows high diagnostic potential as a one-stop diagnostic procedure for the assessment of (active) RPF providing multiparametric supportive information.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Magnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetroperitoneal FibrosisFluorodeoxyglucose F18MultiparametricOne-stop diagnostic procedurePET/MRIRetroperitoneal fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID26969347
OpenAlexW2294491933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.