Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26969270›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2016

Awareness of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and associated practice patterns of primary care physicians and specialists.

Susan Polanco-Briceno, Daniel Glass, Mark Stuntz, Alexis Caze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan Polanco-BricenoDeerfield Institute, 780 3rd Ave., 36th Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA. spolanco-briceno@deerfield.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9887-3595
Daniel GlassDeerfield Institute, 780 3rd Ave., 36th Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Mark StuntzDeerfield Institute, 780 3rd Ave., 36th Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Alexis CazeDeerfield Institute, 780 3rd Ave., 36th Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Deerfield (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome is nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, the progressive form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, have increased risk of fibrosis, cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease. Estimates of prevalence in the United States range from 20-30% for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and 2-5% for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; however, physician awareness of these diseases is limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the current level of physician awareness and practices in the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis within the United States.

methodsPhysicians were asked to participate in an online, 35-question survey about their awareness of various liver conditions and current practices.

resultsOf the 302 responding physicians, 152 were primary care physicians, and 150 were specialists (comprised of gastroenterologists and hepatologists). More specialists than primary care physicians reported that they were aware of the differences between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (p < 0.001) and that they routinely screened for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (p < 0.001) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (p < 0.001). Almost half of the responding primary care physicians reported being unfamiliar with the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis differences even though they were aware of both, yet 58% of those primary care physicians were treating patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and/or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. In addition, those primary care physicians who reported being unfamiliar with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis were treating an average of 3.7 patients and reported being as likely as familiar primary care physicians to treat new patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. More than half of the specialists used noninvasive diagnostic test to confirm nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and 10% of the specialists reported treating patients with drugs not recommended by the current guidelines.

conclusionsDespite reporting they were not familiar with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, primary care physicians reported they would likely continue to diagnose and manage patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; therefore, more physician education on the recent practice guideline for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is needed.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePhysicians, Primary CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'SpecializationBiopsyDemographyHumansInternetLicensureLiverMaleNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAwarenessDiagnosisDisease managementNonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseNonalcoholic steatohepatitisPractice guidelinePrimary care physicians

Identifiers

PMID26969270
PMCPMC4788895
OpenAlexW2293899376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.