Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26969266›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2016

Evolutionary genetics of maternal effects.

Jason B Wolf, Michael J Wade

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Taking quantitative genomics into the wild.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jason B WolfMilner Centre for Evolution and Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom. Jason@evolutionarygenetics.org.
Michael J WadeDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 47405.
Indiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

Epistasis: its role in complex tratis, gene expression and speciationR01GM065414 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI DEMUTH, JEFFERY, WADE, MICHAEL J · 2003 to 2012
$3.1M
The effect of coinheritance on host-symbiont coevolutionR01GM084238 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI WADE, MICHAEL J · 2008 to 2015
$1.6M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C516936/1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065414NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084238NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM084238-07NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM65414-04A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal genetic effects (MGEs), where genes expressed by mothers affect the phenotype of their offspring, are important sources of phenotypic diversity in a myriad of organisms. We use a single-locus model to examine how MGEs contribute patterns of heritable and nonheritable variation and influence evolutionary dynamics in randomly mating and inbreeding populations. We elucidate the influence of MGEs by examining the offspring genotype-phenotype relationship, which determines how MGEs affect evolutionary dynamics in response to selection on offspring phenotypes. This approach reveals important results that are not apparent from classic quantitative genetic treatments of MGEs. We show that additive and dominance MGEs make different contributions to evolutionary dynamics and patterns of variation, which are differentially affected by inbreeding. Dominance MGEs make the offspring genotype-phenotype relationship frequency dependent, resulting in the appearance of negative frequency-dependent selection, while additive MGEs contribute a component of parent-of-origin dependent variation. Inbreeding amplifies the contribution of MGEs to the additive genetic variance and, therefore enhances their evolutionary response. Considering evolutionary dynamics of allele frequency change on an adaptive landscape, we show that this landscape differs from the mean fitness surface, and therefore, under some condition, fitness peaks can exist but not be "available" to the evolving population.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionInheritance PatternsModels, GeneticGene FrequencyGenetic VariationGenotypeInbreedingPhenotypeadaptive landscapedominancefrequency dependent selectionKin selectionSocial effects

Identifiers

PMID26969266
PMCPMC4926267
OpenAlexW2293460080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.