Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26969188›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2016

Structured education can improve primary-care management of headache: the first empirical evidence, from a controlled interventional study.

Mark Braschinsky, Sulev Haldre, Mart Kals, Anna Iofik, Ave Kivisild, Jaanus Korjas, Silvia Koljal, Zaza Katsarava, Timothy J Steiner

Open access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mark BraschinskyEstonian Headache Society, L Puusepa str 8H, Tartu, Estonia.
Sulev HaldreEstonian Headache Society, L Puusepa str 8H, Tartu, Estonia.
Mart KalsEstonian Genome Centre, University of Tartu, Riia 23b, Tartu, Estonia.
Anna IofikFaculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, Tartu, Estonia.
Ave KivisildFaculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, Tartu, Estonia.
Jaanus KorjasFaculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, Tartu, Estonia.
Silvia KoljalFaculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, Tartu, Estonia.
Zaza KatsaravaDepartment of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Timothy J SteinerDepartment of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Edvard Griegs Gate, Trondheim, NO-7489, Norway. t.steiner@imperial.ac.uk.
University of Tartu · EETartu University Hospital · EENorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeadache disorders are under-recognized and under-diagnosed. A principal factor in their suboptimal management is lack of headache-related training among health-care providers, especially in primary care. In Estonia, general practitioners (GPs) refer many headache patients to neurological specialist services, mostly unnecessarily. GPs request "diagnostic" investigations, which are usually unhelpful and therefore wasteful. GP-made headache diagnoses are often arcane and non-specific, and treatments based on these are inappropriate. The aim of this study was to develop, implement and test an educational model intended to improve headache-related primary health care in Estonia.

methodsThis was a controlled study consisting of baseline observation, intervention and follow-up observation using the same measures of effect. It involved six GPs in Põlva and the surrounding region in Southern Estonia, together with their future patients presenting consecutively with headache as their main complaint, all with their consent. The primary outcome measure was referral rate (RR) to neurological specialist services. Secondary measures included number of GP-requested investigations, GP-made headache diagnoses and how these conformed to standard terminology (ICD-10), and GP-recommended or initiated treatments.

resultsRR at baseline (n = 490) was 39.5 %, falling to 34.7 % in the post-intervention group (n = 295) (overall reduction 4.8 %; p = 0.21). In the large subgroup of patients (88 %) for whom GPs made clearly headache-related ICD-10 diagnoses, RR fell by one fifth (from 40 to 32 %; p = 0.08), but the only diagnosis-related RR that showed a statistically significant reduction was (pericranial) myalgia (19 to 3 %; p = 0.03). There was a significant increase towards use of more specific diagnoses. Use of investigations in diagnosing headache reduced from 26 to 4 % (p < 0.0001). Initiation of treatment by GPs increased from 58 to 81 % (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsThese were modest changes in GPs' entrenched behaviour. Nevertheless they were empirical evidence that GPs' practice in the field of headache could be improved by structured education. Furthermore, the changes were likely to be cost-saving. To our knowledge this study is the first to produce such evidence.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementEducation, Medical, ContinuingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareAdultFemaleGeneral PractitionersHeadacheHeadache DisordersHumansMaleMiddle AgedEducationEffect measurementGlobal Campaign against HeadacheHeadache disordersManagementPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID26969188
PMCPMC4788653
OpenAlexW2294347443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.