Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26969141›Full record

ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2016

Psychological Reactions Associated With Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Youth.

Susana R Patton, Mark A Clements

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Perspective of Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Interventions at the Various Stages of Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susana R PattonUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Kansas City, MO, USA spatton2@kumc.edu.
Mark A ClementsChildren's Mercy-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

Longitudinal test of adherence & control in kids new to T1 diabetes & 5-9 yrs oldR01DK100779 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NELSON, EVE-LYNN · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
An interactive mHealth app for better glycemic control in families of young kids with T1DDP3DK108211 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NELSON, EVE-LYNN · 2015 to 2015
$1.0M
Reducing hypoglycemia fear in parents of young kids with video-based telemedicineR21HD081502 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI PATTON, SUSANA R · 2015 to 2016
$424k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD081502NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK108211NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucose monitoring is prerequisite to all other diabetes self-care behaviors and helps patients to reduce their risk for diabetes-related complications due to elevated glycemia. Because of the amount of information available and the ability to deliver glucose results in real-time, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has the ability to improve on self-monitoring blood glucose. However, epidemiologic data demonstrate slow uptake of CGM by patients, especially among youth. Several new diabetes therapies rely on CGM for feedback on patients' glucose levels to optimize treatment (eg, the low-glucose suspend insulin pump) and there are new technologies currently in development that will also need this information to work (eg, the artificial pancreas). To help patients to realize the potential benefits of these new treatments, it is essential to explore patients' psychological and behavioral reactions to CGM and then target device enhancements and/or the development of behavioral therapies to minimize negative reactions and to improve patients' CGM adoption rates. Limited research is available examining the psychological and behavioral reactions of CGM use in youth exclusively, but there are more studies examining these reactions in mixed samples of youth, parents, and adults. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available literature examining psychological and behavioral reactions to CGM use in young people with diabetes and to highlight how the results of past and future studies can inform device updates and/or behavioral intervention development to minimize barriers.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdolescentBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringChildChild, PreschoolDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansInsulin Infusion SystemsMaleSelf Careburdencontinuous glucose monitoringinterventionpsychological adjustmentpsychologyquality of life

Identifiers

PMID26969141
PMCPMC5038546
OpenAlexW2308324502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.