Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26969128›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

The efficacy of a new translational treatment for persecutory delusions: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The Feeling Safe Study).

Daniel Freeman, Felicity Waite, Richard Emsley, David Kingdon, Linda Davies, Ray Fitzpatrick, Graham Dunn

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The revised GreenPsychological medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Persistent persecutory delusions: The spirit, style and content of targeted treatment.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel FreemanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK. daniel.freeman@psych.ox.ac.uk.
Felicity WaiteDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Richard EmsleyCentre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, Manchester University, Manchester Academic Health Centre, Manchester, UK.
David KingdonAcademic Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Linda DaviesCentre for Health Economics, Institute of Population Health, Manchester University, Manchester Academic Health Centre, Manchester, UK.
Ray FitzpatrickNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Graham DunnCentre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, Manchester University, Manchester Academic Health Centre, Manchester, UK.
University of Oxford · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-2014-05-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersecutory delusions (strong unfounded fears that others intend harm to the person) occur in more than 70 % of the patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. This major psychotic experience is a key clinical target, for which substantial improvement in treatment is needed. Our aim is to use advances in theoretical understanding to develop a much more efficacious treatment that leads to recovery in at least 50 % of people with persistent persecutory delusions. Our cognitive conceptualisation is that persecutory delusions are threat beliefs, developed in the context of genetic and environmental risk, maintained by a number of psychological processes including excessive worry, low self-confidence, intolerance of anxious affect and other internal anomalous experiences, reasoning biases, and safety-seeking strategies. The clinical implication is that safety has to be relearned, by entering the feared situations after reduction of the influence of the maintenance factors. We have been individually evaluating modules targeting causal factors. These will now be tested together as a full treatment, called The Feeling Safe Programme. The treatment is modular, personalised, and includes patient preference. We will test whether the new treatment leads to greater recovery in persistent persecutory delusions, psychological well-being, and activity levels compared to befriending (that is, controlling for therapist attention). METHODS/

designThe Feeling Safe Study is a parallel group randomised controlled trial for 150 patients who have persecutory delusions despite previous treatment in mental health services. Patients will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to The Feeling Safe Programme or befriending (both provided in 20 sessions over 6 months). Standard care will continue as usual. Online randomisation will use a permuted blocks algorithm, with randomly varying block size, stratified by therapist. Assessments, by a rater blind to allocation, will be conducted at 0, 6 (post treatment), and 12 months. The primary outcome is the level of delusional conviction at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include levels of psychological well-being, suicidal ideation, and activity. All main analyses will be intention-to-treat. The trial is funded by the NHS National Institute for Health Research. DISCUSSION: The Feeling Safe study will provide a Phase II evaluation of a new targeted translational psychological treatment for persecutory delusions.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN18705064 (registered 11 November 2015).

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyTranslational Research, BiomedicalClinical ProtocolsCognitive Behavioral TherapyEnglandHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMental HealthParanoid DisordersPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesResearch DesignSchizophrenia, ParanoidSuicidal IdeationTime FactorsTreatment Outcomecognitive therapyParanoiapersecutory delusionspsychosisschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID26969128
PMCPMC4788840
OpenAlexW2294742271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.