ReviewPlanta2016
Towards development of new ornamental plants: status and progress in wide hybridization.
Review in Planta, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding hybrid origins and genetic architecture of leaf traits variation inHorticulture research · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Complexities of Flowering in Ornamental Plants: The Interplay of Genetics, Hormonal Networks, and Microbiome.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Genetic Cause of Hybrid Lethality Observed in Reciprocal Interspecific Crosses betweenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Genetic Engineering and Genome Editing Advances to Enhance Floral Attributes in Ornamental Plants: An Update.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Creating novel ornamentalsFrontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Comparative chloroplast genome analyses of Amomum: insights into evolutionary history and species identification.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- New Insight into Ornamental Applications of Cannabis: Perspectives and Challenges.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Maternal Donor ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Production of interspecific hybrids between Japanese gentians and wild species ofBreeding science · 2019Article
- Production and characterization of intersectional hybrids betweenPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2019Article
- Reconstituting the genome of a young allopolyploid crop, Brassica napus, with its related species.Plant biotechnology journal · 2019Article
- Article
- Genetic changes in a novel breeding population of Brassica napus synthesized from hundreds of crosses between B. rapa and B. carinata.Plant biotechnology journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionThe present review provides insights into the key findings of the hybridization process, crucial factors affecting the adaptation of new technologies within wide hybridization of ornamental plants and presents perspectives of further development of this strategy. Wide hybridization is one of the oldest breeding techniques that contributed enormously to the development of modern plant cultivars. Within ornamental breeding, it represents the main source of genetic variation. During the long history of wide hybridization, a number of methods were implemented allowing the evolution from a conventional breeding tool into a modern methodology. Nowadays, the research on model plants and crop species increases our understanding of reproductive isolation among distant species and partly explains the background of the traditional approaches previously used for overcoming hybridization barriers. Characterization of parental plants and hybrids is performed using molecular and cytological techniques that strongly facilitate breeding processes. Molecular markers and sequencing technologies are used for the assessment of genetic relationships among plants, as the genetic distance is typically depicted as one of the most important factors influencing cross-compatibility in hybridization processes. Furthermore, molecular marker systems are frequently applied for verification of hybrid state of the progeny. The flow cytometry and genomic in situ hybridization are used in the assessment of hybridization partners and characterization of hybrid progeny in relation to genome stabilization as well as genome recombination and introgression. In the future, new research and technologies are likely to provide more detailed information about genes and pathways responsible for interspecific reproductive isolation. Ultimately, this knowledge will enable development of strategies for obtaining compatible lines for hybrid production. Recent development in sequencing technologies and availability of sequence data will also facilitate creation of new molecular markers that will advance marker-assisted selection in hybridization process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.