ArticleHeart and vessels2016
Moderate vasomotor response to acetylcholine provocation test as an indicator of long-term prognosis.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Coronary Microvascular Disease and Coronary Vasospasm in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Pooled it
- Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Coronary Vasomotor Disorders.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Should the Right Coronary Artery Be Routinely Assessed During Provocative Spasm Testing?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Provoked Epicardial Spasm Phenotypes via Intracoronary Acetylcholine Testing in 680 Patients with Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during intracoronary acetylcholine provocation test.Heart and vessels · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test (ACh-test) is used for the diagnosis of vasospastic angina (VSA). However, subjects often show a moderate spasm (MS) response for which diagnosis of VSA is not definitive, and the clinical significance of this response is unknown. We assessed moderate coronary vasomotor response to the ACh test as an indicator of long-term prognosis. A total of 298 consecutive patients who underwent the ACh test for suspected VSA were retrospectively investigated. Coronary spasm severity after intracoronary administration of isosorbide dinitrate was evaluated by measuring epicardial coronary artery diameter reduction after ACh injection. Patients were divided into three groups according to the diameter reduction during the ACh test: severe spasm (SS) showing ≥75 % diameter reduction, MS showing ≥50 % diameter reduction, and others (N). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates with a median follow-up of 4.6 years were significantly worse in SS (11.1 %) and MS (8.5 %) than N (1.9 %), (SS vs N; P = 0.009, MS vs N; P = 0.029). Significant difference in MACE rates was not observed between SS and MS (P = 0.534). Cox regression analysis revealed that MS remained an independent predictor of MACE after adjustment for other confounders (HR: 7.18, 95 % CI 1.42-36.4, P = 0.017). Patients with MS by ACh test had a cardiac event rate comparable with that of patients with SS and significantly worse than that of patients with normal vasomotor responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.