ArticleHeart and vessels2016
Impact of left ventricular systolic dysfunction on the outcomes of percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair using MitraClip.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conventional echocardiographic parameters or three-dimensional echocardiography to evaluate right ventricular function in percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PMVR).International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2019Article
- Predictors of thrombus formation after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN device.Heart and vessels · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVD) is associated with poor outcomes after mitral regurgitation (MR) surgery. MitraClip (MC) is a novel treatment option for MR patients with a high surgical risk. However, outcomes of LVD patients underwent MC remain unclear. In total of 194 patients after MC implantation, 75 patients (39 %) had severe LVD (LV ejection fraction ≤30 %). Patients with severe LVD were primarily male and also younger. Logistic euroSCOREs were comparable between the two groups. Functional MR was more common in patients with severe LVD, while New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was similar between the two groups. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was significantly higher in patients with LVD. In addition to similar improvements in MR severity, NYHA class, and NT-proBNP levels, the survival rates were not different between patients with and without severe LVD. Among patients with severe LVD, the long-term survival rates were significantly lower in patients aged ≥75 years, those with NT-proBNP >5000 pg/mL, and those with atrial fibrillation (AF). In conclusion, severe LVD was not associated with the mortality after MC implantation. MC might be feasible and effective even in the patients with severe MR and low LVEF. However, we need to carefully observe severe LVD patients who are elderly, have a high NT-proBNP level, and have AF, as these might be considered high-risk subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.